More CHAnges to come! [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
More CHAnges to come! - An anti-oppression feminist personal journal.

[ CHAnges - An LGBTQI2S Feminist-friendly Space. | Click Here for CHAnges. ]
[ Questions, etc.? | Click Here for Contact Info & the FAQ. ]
[ Past Entries? | Click for the Archive. ]

Beyond Human Or Machinery - The X-Men's Karima Shapandar. [Jun. 22nd, 2009|01:35 pm]
[Tags|, , ]
[Audio | - 11. Peaceful Days]

I look for paper mirrors quite a bit - though what's fun is that I can be rather flexible in finding them. I suppose I see a lot of myself in quite a diverse selection of characters. One of the factors that appeal to me in terms of a paper mirror is cultural identity. I identify as West-Indian (ethnically, I'm Indo-Guyanese) - but as a Hindu and a brown person and someone with East Indian ancestors, I find myself drawn to East Indian characters as well. Unfortunately, within Western media, there's a very real and very large lack of Indian characters (and many of them are, unfortunately, very stereotypical in presentation and tone).

That's why I am thrilled with the ongoing dynamic use and inclusion of Karima Shapandar; also known by her X-Men alias Omega Sentinel. A quick primer; Karima Shapandar is an Omega-Prime Sentinel (human beings fitted with nannites so that they become mindless Sentinels) whose original personality and mind were restored to her via the combined efforts of Magneto and Professor Xavier. Previously a detective-inspector in her native Mumbai, she’s now an associate of the X-Men (having been an X-Man, a member of Excalibur, a brainwashed member of the Marauders, and a temporary member of the Acolytes).

Chris Claremont had this to say when asked about her creation and usage;
"I liked the idea of her. The notion... of someone being transformed into a wholly mechanical being and what effects that has on sense of self, sense of soul? She’s an outcast from both human and mutant society, yet bound by her own personal sense of honor to try to protect both. Callisto’s (another character in the Excalibur series) one kind of 'monster,' Karima’s another. They both have their measure of prejudice to overcome."

I adore her narrative; it directly deals with body politics while bringing racist politics and sexist politics along for the ride. One of my favourite aspects of her journey (specifically in Excalibur) is that she was logically going back and forth between aberration and enjoyment in terms of her new status, which cleanly and elegantly lands itself into a clear goal (vocalized in X-Men Vol 2). This is really the most organic way that this could have ended up, because Karima’s consistently demonstrated both a sense of conviction and assertiveness. She’s a police officer. She clearly takes pride in her status and appears to be emotionally tied to her practice of her ethics – clearly upset when she feels she has done something so wrong in a previous life to deserve her new form, but actively engages in psychological healing by working towards a sense of justice and peace. The act of working towards providing justice and peace – by protecting people – would lead her to recognize the great use of her new abilities. Karima can’t undo the past; this has happened and all she can do is heal. And instead of passively falling into despair, she finds solace and healing in taking action – it is very much the practice of Metta (a primarily-recognized-as-Buddhist concept, but is critical in Hinduism (including Shaktism, which Karima seems to practice); actively healing one’s self by acting in the beneficial needs and interests of others.

Subsequently, this leads to an excellent sexist subversion and creates a wonderfully empowering character. Karima may be a victim, but she never actively victimizes herself. Her agency, once in question, is now never in question – while initially there was internal conflict as to what she is, it never became a defeat. That was never a question. Instead, she is active in saving, protecting and fighting for herself and for others. Karima, as a character, while introduced as the love interest of a man, has already overshadowed him and become a notable, fleshed-out character in her own right (and even in her introduction, she was portrayed as an active agent in her life). She was introduced as a person of skill, duty and reliability. And that characterization has continued as such, while she overcame the position of love interest (and as a foil for two older men; as mentioned later). This woman is no Bollywood swooning Indian woman, she is a well-developed character that both relishes her cultural identity and pushes past the stereotypical depictions of it.

For the most part, Karima’s managed to escape being oversexualized and objectified in rendering. Brett Booth, despite a rather unimpressive design, rendered her in a dynamic active manner. Aaron Lopresti rendered her in a wonderful manner (there’s a reason he went on to produce some of the most empowering and respectful Wonder Woman art in the past 10 years) despite a rather odd design; she had clear muscle definition, flat footwear an her posture was not geared towards male gaze T&A shots (though there was at least one odd waist view with ass-boobs view). Chris Bachalo, while not recognizing the muscle definition, managed to portray her with dynamic posture that avoided T&A shots (even when she was nude). Humberto Ramos, unfortunately, did focus on T&A shots but thankfully never got very far due to the full-body coverage of her Bachalo!Design (though we did get some infantilized hairstyles and giant breast shots). Scot Eaton may have had one or two super-curvy-look-ass shots, but they’ve generally been a rarity and never to the point of suspending belief.

The colourist for the Scot Eaton-rendered issues and the Humberto Ramos-rendered issues did, unfortunately, lighten her skin – but never to the point of her original design. I’m frankly very happy that the colourists who worked with Lopresti and Bachalo did make and keep her skin as rather dark; as Colorism is still and issue and it’s incredibly frustrating to see a lack of respect towards the replication of brown skin. I will note that she has not been as much of a victim of this as DC’s Vixen or X-Factor’s Monet, but this is still a very problematic and racist trend. I’m hoping that future appearances restore her skin colour to being as dark as Excalibur-appearances.

While I’ve noted her rendering above; I believe special distinction should be made for her designs (in which there have been primarily 2 specific silhouettes). While her first consistent design (designed by Aaron Lopresti) is rather distinctive, I don’t feel it’s necessarily in a beneficial way. While the outfit itself was rather odd (the strongest visual cue being her silver boots, otherwise it was a rather strange design), the feature to stand out, though, is her hairstyle. While Cliff Richards rendered it in a more natural-appearing manner, it’s just one of the most anachronistic hairstyle choices I’ve seen in that it resembles the movement of dreadlocks (despite it being straight strands of hair). One can see the problem in terms of misidentity – combine a hairstyle that (in silhouette if not texture) is culturally associated with people who are black with a genre that is known for portraying black people as white people with darker skin, and you have a visual coding that leads to blackness. This wouldn’t be a problem if she were a well-fleshed out, breaking-stereotypes black character – but she’s not. She’s most likely of an Indian ethnic group (one of hundreds, if not thousands), and while the Western world doesn't have a lot of hairstyles that are indicative of South Asian hair-that-isn't-imported-from-the-West, choosing hair that has a silhouette as such reads as unintentionally irresponsible when considering visual communication & visual shortcuts. Granted, this could have gone so much worse - he could have gone out of his way to have her wear a full-fledged sari and give her a bindi (despite the, you know, whole not married thing) so this design, showcasing her ease of movement, isn't terrible (and again, he rendered her rather wonderfully, flat footwear, athletic poses and body, etc.). It's just a rather strange choice in terms of what her primary character traits are (cyborg sentinel, cop, Indian, visually-coded as female).

The Bachalo design, however, is something I find as incredibly dynamic and successful - it still manages to give her full body coverage, is meaningfully visually differentiated from the rest of the team (how many X-Men have a combination of white and red and black as their primary colours? None, because that's pretty much Alpha Flight's thing and at this point I'd almost like to see her just join Alpha Flight because she'd visually fit right in). I'm very happy he had went with full body coverage where in this instance, a great number of pencillers would have gone with a close-to-naked design and justified it in story with 'She's a cyborg, who cares what she wears!'. It speaks well of the design when (again, as noted above), other artists have tried to render her in a sexually objectified manner and had trouble successfully doing so via her full-body design. While I would have preferred wavy hair (as pure straight hair like hers is something of a huge rarity in Indian ethnicities), this still isn't bad per say (the hair itself seems pretty thick as is, which is nice). The design is easily recognizable from a distance but doesn't fall apart when up close. It's definitely a rather successful design, so much that I would love to see Aaron Lopresti render her in this design (his rendering is absurdly good, I'm just not a fan of his outfit and character designs as much).

One of the most initially appealing factors for me was the fact that Karima was a practicing Hindu – and as seen here, she maybe a practicing Shaktist (in that the first deity she cried out to was Maadevi). I don’t really have a strong body of characters to which I can actually source as actively identifying as Hindu; my mind tends to go to the (now sadly defunct) Virgin Comics for sourcing Hindu stories (and while it was a great treat; there were some problematic issues – in ‘India Authentic’, the tales involving the goddesses often involved misogynistic tropes (of particular annoyance was Mahasaraswati’s tale), and Devi (while super-awesome) didn’t exactly source the female Hindu or Vedic goddesses (bar Mahadevi), losing a wonderful opportunity to create new interpretations of said goddesses). Otherwise, I tend to draw a blank – and while there are a number of characters inspired by the Hindu pantheon, there aren’t really many known worshippers. Furthermore, as noted above, Karima seems to specifically be a Shaktist (though that’s presumption on my part, in that she hasn’t identified as one per say). This is such a wonderful piece of identity to see; in that Hinduism as a religion tends to not even be portrayed (often the concepts and deities exist, but the worshippers not so much). And when it is portrayed, it’s done so rather clumsily (for a good comparison of the misconception towards Hinduism, check out this article about karma – and then apply the level of misunderstanding to Hinduism & Vedic practice as a whole). While Karima isn’t a perfect example of a practicing-Hindu character (that trait seems to have disappeared entirely during the Mike Carey usage), that fact that it’s an integral factor in her own character arc as well as a source of strength for her was great to see. I really, really hope we see more of her as a practicing Hindu – it’s already clearly established that she’s not fanatical, so consistent-but-not-overbearing-usage of her religious beliefs would be great to see.

One of the interesting notes about Karima’s role in the X-narratives is that she plays a direct foil to both Professor Charles Xavier and Magneto (outside of him being a villain primarily) in a relatively equal manner (as opposed to leaning one way or the other too much). Only a few characters have done as such; Gabrielle Haller, the New Mutants (primarily Dani, Sam, Roberto, Rahne, Amara, Illyana, Doug, and Xian), and possibly Rogue (I hesitate to put Ororo in here; in that despite her getting along with him rather well while he was Headmaster, his subsequent actions in X-Men Vol 2 1-3, and murder of Jean in Planet X probably wiped out the majority of goodwill Ororo had towards him – Rogue is a ‘possibly’, because she was much closer to Magneto than Storm and has also had considerable interaction with Charles). When looking at this list, one can tell very quickly that Karima has a very specific position; different from any of these people – she’s not someone who was a student of theirs (formally, or even for a long period informally), and she was never a romantic interest of either of them. Rather, she’s an adult who has similar training (via her background as a police officer) who was forced into the conflict of mutants VS humans by both her ideological standing and her new status as a living being – which was entirely due to the combined; efforts of both the Professor and Magneto. She’s literally living proof of their potential to bring harmony through co-operation, but this does not rob her of her own personhood; which is notable in that while she’s actively thankful to both of them, she still questions their thinking in a productive manner. Rather than being someone to solely learn from them, Karima actively contributes to both of them – helping them come to new conclusions. Furthermore, she’s an active ally of theirs – rather than support, she’s a front liner (potentially for both of them). It’s an interesting parallel to Rogue, even – one character who’s lived a major part of her life seeking their (potentially failing) help, and one character who’s spent minimal time with them and received an almost total solution (that comparison also makes you feel very, very bad for Rogue). Karima could very, very easily fall into the role of wide-eyed-learn-from-the-white-men ethnic girl (and there have been moments where it’s been close to appearing that way), she has instead been treated as their colleague and friend – someone to respect, care for (when necessary), not infantilize, and recognize as having her own unique body of knowledge which is equally important as theirs. In this manner, Karima herself can be seen as a living example of the X-Dream - even one step further, in that she was forced into a position that should have her killing mutants, but instead works for her own salvation and the salvation of others. There was no question in her human mind that mutants are people, and for a Sentinel to believe this - even if she has a human consciousness - is incredibly poetic.

And poetic contemporary X-Men whom have lasted as long as she has - what with X-world revamps every few months or so - are a rarity. She's managed to stay in use because a number of writers found this gem of a character and worked with her; meaningfully adding her experience and the audiences by including her. She's by far one of my favourite X-characters of all time, and she's only been in published books a handful of times. Karima, rather than draining from the X-mythos like a leech, adds to it in a significant way - by being the sum parts of her heritage and ethics, and adding more. I hope to see her for some time in the future, as a character that may grow in a pace that defies our hectic world. She's definitely a modern-day positive role-model; someone who practices her ethical stance without preaching it to us in a condescending manner. Here's hoping to her growth and beneficial usage as a character, worthy of Maadevi herself.
linkLeave a comment!

She's Indian! Then not. Identities are just that malleable. [Jun. 12th, 2009|01:39 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Audio |Aria Asia - Chiisana Koi no Uta]

There's been some rumbling since E3 about the PSP and it's future - how the PSPGo is primarily a waste (which makes me very giddy that I managed to get a cheap 1000 model; I seem to be a poser-retro gamer), and the advent that all PSP games will be available for download since the GO has no UMD drive. Either way, I was surprised by some of the future releases (other than Warriors Orochi 2, which I'd planned on purchasing beforehand) - Persona is one, Final Fantasy XIII Agito is another, but what I want to talk about is Tekken 6. Tekken 6 actually had the beautiful audacity to introduce a (what I understood at the time) Indian woman to a fighting game?

I was incredibly excited by the (now re-written) introduction of Zafina to Tekken 6;

The first character, Zafina is an Indian female who will have moves Harada likened to that of a "spider"and who enters the tournament to prevent the clash of the "two evil stars", believed to be Kazuya and Jin.

Subsequently I read more and became incredibly interested!

Zafina, who has great spiritual powers, was born to a group of spiritual warriors with an ancient past.

Since childhood, Zafina was raised to be a protector of an imperial tomb. Several years ago, a foreign army attacked the imperial tomb she and her group were protecting, and Zafina single handedly wiped every single one of them out. Since then, the group’s guru appointed her to be its sole assassin.

In her public life, she uses her spiritual powers as an astrologist, but recently she can only see evil omens, and her premonitions grow more and more intense day by day. Seeking to understand the meaning behind all of this, Zafina sought the advice of her guru, and he began to tell her an ancient tale passed down from generation to generation only to a select few. According to the tale, two evil stars will shake the world when they come into contact, and, inevitably, the two will unite with the sealed ancient evil being protected by her group, destroying the world. Zafina considered the meaning behind the guru’s tale and her premonitions well.

Setting out on a course that took her far east, to the place the evil stars were believed to be gathering, she journeyed with the intentions of destroying them.


Indian character? Woman? Defender of a tomb? Astrologer? Conviction? I was there. I'd always liked Tekken as a franchise, but ever since the death of Jun I'd struggled to find someone I like. And then they come out with this amazing woman, especially introducing her alongside the incredibly badass looking Leo? Well, Tekken had won me over (with my charitable nature concerning baby steps - because while the design is visually a treasure trove for the male gaze; the fact that an Indian woman was being shown with such conviction and agency was enough for me to forgive the problems somewhat).

Since then, things have gotten messy.

Zafina's ended up in ethnically ambiguous territory - she's associated with Egyptian imagery (one of her sets of alternate outfits is known as the 'Isis' set; the temple she is defending has two large statues of Ra), and Arabic iconography (her name is Arabic for 'Victorious', and director Katsuhiro Harada describes her as being Middle-Eastern). As well - and there hasn't been official confirmation of this - Zafina's fighting style was presumed to be based on Kalarippayattu, though it's officially listed as 'Ancient Assassination'. This assumption of Kalarippayattu most likely came about because initial interviews with Katsuhiro Harada were understood to confirm her as Indian (though if she were Indian, she would be from the northern or north-eastern area of India as her skin is that light, and Kalarippayattu is a primarily a Tamil & southern Indian martial art). Otherwise, her nationality is been officially stated as 'unknown'.

This isn't to say that identifying as Egyptian is mutually exclusive with identifying as 'Middle-Eastern' (seriously, there are countries in there - at least list the United Arab Emirates or something along those lines). But would it have been so difficult to actually give her a definitive nationality? It's almost heartbreaking - I've seen a number of reactions where people were genuinely excited to see an Indian woman in a fighting game. Press releases got in that game too. She would have been the first. Then it seems the translation was changed - Indian became Middle-Eastern. And then we saw more details of her intial context, and it introduced Ancient Egyptian iconography. It's frustrating that instead of definitively focusing on one ethnicity and cultural background, they created a character that's a mishmash of major areas of two freakin' continents. It really, really hurts any chance of Zafina being something of a strong paper mirror. I may not be a slinky assassin, but as an amateur astrologer and someone with Indian ancestry - it would have been nice to see.

And this isn't even to bring in arguably the worst part; in that her ethnic ambiguity has essentially led her into being coded in a male gazey Orientalism-based arabian princess type (with a pinch of sexy assassin). The fact that she's openly erotic in presentation is slightly diffused by the fact that the franchise has a strong number of female charactes (though the one who really saves it is Leo). And as much as I bloody adore Leo's design, I more or less flipped lovingly at Zafina's character because she as introduced as Indian, an astrologer, and a fighter - despite the problematic sexist design and carriage. Whether or not the introduction as an Indian character was a mistake or a miscommunication, people were genuinely excited - myself included. The destruction of not just her Indian ethnicity, but of any definitive ethnicity renders Zafina as less-than-progressive - she's become a racist, ambiguous mystical Othered character. There's a strong, definitive history of these mystical racially-othered characters and the fact that they took away a strong cultural identity really does hurt the character (and thusly, the franchise's depiction of women of colour as a whole). Instead of a character with roots that people could really understand and identify with, it's become a mismash of ethnic othering and sexist imagery.
linkLeave a comment!

Take 30 & the loss of progressive public discussion in mass media. [Jun. 11th, 2009|03:31 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Audio |Kenmochi Hidefumi - Avante]

This clip from the 1960s & 70s CBC television series, Take 30, is a phenomenal peice of discussion and a beautiful example of dialogue leading to growth and insight. It frankly speaks about systematic oppression in the Western world and the discussion is focused on defining the problem, what the goals are, and developing a strategy to ethically reach that goal. It features the incredibly astute and inspiring Kathleen Cleaver, as well as four other woman I'm not as familiar with - the late Jane Jacobs, Aboriginal Filmmaker Alanis Obomsawin, Wilfred Laurier profressor Margaret Norquay, and student leader Jennifer Penny (whom I'm unable to find information on).

One of the most beautiful facets of this discussion is that they aren't agreeing to disagree - instead, they're having a dialogue to deconstruct the perceptions they have one one another and thusly creating a solid foundation in which they can reliably define their goals, and the strategy to reach said goal. Penny and Prof. Norquay both acknowledge they're lack of understanding how one feels in Canadian Aboriginal oppression, and they express as such with a recognition that even though the problem isn't about them, something needs to be done. Cleaver respectfully and passionately deconstructs the perceptions the other women inadvertantly have (the best example is of The Right Hon. Clarkson's use of the phrase 'overthrowing the system'). Jacobs manages to obliterate the logical fallacy of 'white or black', by actively affirming the plight of ghettoized black Americans and the acknowledged manipulation of the white American majority. And Penny openly stated that individual action will not work when trying to increase living quality on a national and international scale. These are all peices of content that could be communicated in a way that was insulting or demeaning to the listening parties. It wasn't. They were treated as active contributors.

The Right Hon. Clarkson's questions and moderating of the discussion are direct and wonderfully clear - specifically, the questions she poses to Obamsawin, Jacobs and Cleaver. This discussion is by no means attempting to be impartial; the fact that they've created a panel discussing society and systematic oppression with 6 women is pretty clearly indicative of where the value system of the clip (and series) lies. The Right Hon. knows this, and thusly prepared and posed questions which would allow the women to expand on points of understanding that may be different from the other women - which would in turn prompt a dialogue about how to learn from each other (look at her smiling during Obamsawin's explanation of how she feels oppression and anger). She probably knew that this is the most likely outcome; given that these women are all actively dedicated to a feminist practice of learning from one another in an active, engaging manner. Furthermore, The Right Hon. doesn't directly participate in this discussion herself because a beneficial moderator steers the discussion rather than controlling it (if one tries to control it, then they shouldn't be moderating - they should be on their own platform, espousing what content they have).

One factor that does strike me is the whitification of The Right Hon. with her make-up. Compare her face in the clip with her here. While she's in a different age bracket, eyes don't shrink when one gets older. Although it's somewhat notable that sometimes it did show through to the credit of the CBC. Unfortunately, this was (and is) incredibly common in doing television make-up for women of East Asian & Pacific Islander ethnicity. It's the entire mindset of 'if you look too ethnic, the audience won't identify with you!', which I won't bother explaining in it's ridiculous offensiveness and ignorance.

One of my favourite parts of this discussion is how Cleaver communicates. Her content was beautiful, of course - but how she communicated it as such was so refreshing. It was honest, sincere, down-to-earth, and matter-of-factly. She was very, very open about the fact that people of privilege were welcome as long as they offer help that affirms the oppressed group's agency, and she was still very clear about the notion of privilege and how America's privileged classes don't respond to anything but violence. And even though there was a clear disconnect - her and Obomsawin's exchange about white conciouse - they still actively listend, affirmed and respected each other. And to be frank, I know there was a miscommunication there - it's clear from Cleaver's acceptance of accepting meaningful aid from privileged classes, that she was reffering to white people as a class, whereas I'd imagine Obomsawin was reffering to specific white individuals. And throughout her remarks, Cleaver carried herself with both conviction and open sensitivity, as well with a sense of forgiveness for potential offenses - her own, and others.

I love that Obomsawin went ahead and spoke with clarity and conviction about the frustration, rage, continued dissapointment and dignity that the Aboriginal peoples feel when dealing with predominately white institutions. Her entire change of mood could almost be classified as a narrative journey on our part; her opening up and change of mood and tone and sense of conviction - her emotional openness was an excellent, progressive change of pace for discussions that are often submerged in stoic rationality. It added so much to the discussion in terms of recognition of what is progressive action; in order to create a world of justice, we need to glorify both emotion and rational thought and nurture them together. They need harmony. And Obomsawin clearly is not in a state of harmony (having said as such) because of the cultural dissonance thurst upon her via white Canadian patriarchy.

I makes me incredibly sad to conciously recognize that we couldn't have such a debate openly in this era. This debate would be accused of pandering to the minorities, and that there isn't equal representation, and the entire false reality of post-racism/sexism/etc. would rear it's head, saying that we're excluding the voices of privilege. The ultimate voice of privilege. This entire scene would be slandered because it didn't recognize white male heterosexual able-bodied supremacy in a minority space that recognizes other voices first. The potential to have these discussions in popular mass media has been almost completley destroyed in the past decade or so. I just hope that we all manage to safeguard the ability to have these discussions at all.
linkLeave a comment!

Fictional solidarity and the badassery of Adrienne Clarkson & Gov. Gen. Michelle Jean. [Jun. 2nd, 2009|12:22 pm]
[Tags|, , , ]
[Audio |Indigo Jam Unit - REN]

As much as this is a complex issue that deserves quite a deal of critique, I can't help but be totally impressed by Governor General Michaelle Jean's badassery in the face of demonization, accusation and blatant attacks on her character in an event that's been grossly oversimplified and colluded with incredibly sexist comparisons.

The woman stands her ground, states what she did with conviction and pride, and manages to come out as a figure of awe in this scenario. However, what I want to talk about is not the heart eating in and of itself. What I want to talk about is the incredibly sexist, racist and just ignorant assumption that Adrienne Clarkson has some vendetta against Michaelle Jean, when in reality it's far more likely that she just doesn't care because it's none of her business.

One of my favourite (and by favourite, I mean absolutely abhorred) creations of media fiascos is the nurtured perception of some crapshoot catfight rivalry. As we all know, the Patriarchy and patriarchal media love a good cat fight. And if they can't find one, they'll misrepresent or make it up and use it as entertainment for the patriarchal gaze. And this article so lovingly states, Adrienne Clarkson - by voicing neither condemnation or approval - is throwing Jean to the sharks, via her lack of acknowledgment of the act. This is utter bull, I find - there isn't even a consideration of the idea that Adrienne didn't offer an opinion because this has nothing to do with her. Yes, she was and is an active part of establishing solidarity with people of indigenous roots - and this work is incredibly important in establishing a culture of inclusiveness and personhood - but this does not mean that there is any obligation or duty to judge, comment on or even be aware of the Governor General's activities. If she has a comment, then it's because of her own concerns about how this may affect the relationship between Canada's persons of indigenous heritage and the Canadian federal government or the like. It's not because she has a responsibility to Governor General Michaelle Jean. I know this. I have a pretty good hunch that both Adrienne Clarkson and Michaelle Jean know this. Media channels seem to be the only ones who missed this memo.

One of the fallacies of (white, straight, people with privilege, etc.) people's perception of minority groups is that there's clear, tacit solidarity with everyone who's a part of said group. This isn't so, and it completely destroys the the notion of internalized isms and levels of social hierarchy. White liberal media loves the idea that all minority groups are monolithically loving to one another and to other minority groups, while fanatical Patriarchy loves it when people of minority status fight amongst one another for affirmation from it. Neither assumption has any logical basis in reality.

There is nothing that says that these two women have to be best friends. They don't even have to be close. They're women whom have occupied the same position, and they can respect each others careers. And that's it. They don't have to do anymore or any less. Just because they're both women of colour does not mean that there is instant or inherent solidarity between them. They're people, with tastes and perceptions and likes and dislikes all of their own. They're allowed to make their own friends, social circles, and community. And there isn't anything that says they have to be involved in each others social community. As well, there's nothing that says these women are absolute archenemies; vying to see who can take down who in a manner of total humiliation. Simply because they had similar careers or have similar status in patriarchal social hierarchy doesn't mean that they're clawing at each other for scraps of fame or affirmation. These women have little to nothing to do with one another, and as human beings that often happens. They are just two women whom happen to have the same career, similar spoken goals and comparable patriarchal social standing. Those factors to not lead to instantaneous bonding. It's an insult to the nurtured and developed solidarity within feminist communities and anti-oppressive movements to assume that such bonding is so easy. It's never as easy as recognizing shared plights.

It's incredibly offensive on both ends to assume that Adrienne Clarkson somehow is required to comment or have a comment on Governor General Jean's actions. Again, if Adrienne Clarkson went ahead and actually had a comment on the Governor Generals actions, I would presume it would be out of a sense of bond towards the North of Canada and because of solidarity with the Inuit people as opposed to some presumed-by-others connection that she had towards the Governor General because of shared status. It presumes meaningful bonds and solidarity are formed solely from an identification of shared status, and completely destroys the work nurturing positive emotional perceptions and connections between one another. If Governor General Michaelle Jean and Adrienne Clarkson form such a bond, then all the more beneficial for them - those bonds only enhance our quality of life, provided we have continued commitment to them.

But making out a relationship (positive or negative) between two individuals when there isn't one just makes you look like you have a thick head, media channels. And you guys really don't need that.

And in case you haven't noted - I freakin' admire and adore both of these women. Oh, heroes of mine these two are.
linkLeave a comment!

Metropia, race politics and Fat-O-Sphere amazingness. [May. 13th, 2009|08:38 am]
[Tags|, , ]
[Audio |Yumi Kawamura - Can't Stop Loving You]

This entry (except for the end), while being posted at 8:45ish in the morning, was written the night before at around 11:10PM.

So, I haven't been able to write that review I said I would since it seems that said bit about my internet working? Was apparently a lie. We need a new modem as well. That (effectively removing any potential access I could have had to the story) in combination with this strange headache I ended up developing when I got home pretty much killed any good mood I may have had throughout the day.

Thank god I stayed up late enough to catch Metropia - even the 5 minute flashback to the last episode was badass; showing a scene which many young people whom are gay whom have had to come out to parents of South Asian descent could identify with. And now Raj is showing glorious man breast while dancing with his archetypical fag hag. I openly admit to being a breast man, and man breasts are something I do love. Also, there's this really awesomely sexy East Asian bartender. He looks a little like Robin Shou.

Hey, Maya's still here! She didn't leave! Though her brother, Raj's boyfriend, did! Gone to Paris! What the hell? People with money should not be prone to drama. Becuase trips like that happen. And yes, I am totally biased towards the plots featuring the people of colour; because I am so oversaturated with dramatic plots featuring white people. I'm like a sponge that drips white people drama.

Anyways, what I can talk about is Lessons From the Fat-O-Sphere. This book is fricking amazing; and one factor that I adore - and was wondering if they were going to go through with it - is that they used written material and sourced from their blogs. A number of the anecdotes the two of them noted (the women with the thyroid tumor, The Fantasy of Being Thin, and how Kate met Al) were all stories that were shared and completely absorbed and affirmed by their respecting FA communities.

The book has the greatest practical dating advice I've ever heard; and again they affirm the fact that most of us probably know this but can't seem to believe this and alter our behaviour in a beneficial manner. This particular passage stuck out because this was something I did and still do (though less than before);

...there are obviously some standards on which you don't want to compromise - and we would never recommend dating someone you don't feel any sexual chemistry with, just because he or she is there and willing. There are going to be people you're just not attracted to and never will be - and vice-versa. These people do not make good long term partners. But do evaluate if you are willing to compromise on some things. You know what else kept Kate single for ages? Her list of characteristics any potential partner would have to have: tall, funny, Ivy League-educated (even though she wasn't!), unflaggingly feminist, clean-shaven, bespectacled, nerdy-cute, gainfully employed in an artistic field (yeah, seriously), ready to live in either Canada or the States according to her dual-citizen whims, willing to consider being a stay-at-home dad... and it went on and on from there. That guy? Does not exist. Being willing to give a little will open up your dating pool a lot more than losing fifty pounds would.

While not an exact copy, it's pretty darn close. If there's one factor I won't compromise on, it's the unflaggingly feminist part - but really, everything else is more or less up for grabs. It needs to be because projecting to that degree is completely impractical. If I want someone with those traits, well - I have to be willing to be that full of conviction and boundary concerning my own identity, and I'm not because I'm aware identity is fluid. Long story short, one has to be adaptable because people are sort of human beings.

Outside of that, they have a ton of practical dating advice. It's really what stuck out to me the most, and really made me realize that I am looking - all the time, in a manner - but that I'm also practically engaged with the idea that I don't need a partner to be happy. It's partially the entire 'want what I don't have' idea. But I still want it, and if I ever decide to go through with it, I trust that I have pretty much the best guide to realistic dating ever.

I suppose this goes back to Metropia, and the fact that now that I've managed to being seriously looking at white supremacy, internalized racism and class privilege, has allowed me to really open up my pool of potentials. Give me... 2 or 3 years in the past? And there is no way in hell I would have considered dating a black guy or a brown guy, no matter how gorgeous and awesome they were. No way in hell. Internalized racism did that to me, it really encouraged me to develop such a strong hate for any potential images that correlated with my West Indian background and reject it entirely.

Because patriarchy had constructed stereotypes for me to break, in order to participate seriously in patriarchy I had to openly disassociate myself from said stereotypes in order to break myself from them. That means developing and nurturing a prejudice against dating anything but guys from either a White upper class background or a Chinese-from-Hong-Kong upper class background. Anything else meant I wasn't civilized; it meant I was confirming those nasty, dirty stereotypes.

Thankfully, I now have the skills, inner fortitude, and (most of all) the supportive community to nurture healthier attitudes. I'm still divesting of all of that internalized racism (not to mention sexism and homophobia and ableism and fat-phobia and ageism and classism), but it's a day-to-day battle. And again - I have help. Part of the reason I'm able to claim such independence is because I know I have the help to fall back on. Realistically, it's the only healthy option.

What's also healthy for you is enjoying my new Gaia avatar, because it is super awesome.
linkLeave a comment!

Tamil people are People. Full stop. [May. 11th, 2009|08:49 am]
[Tags|, ]
[Audio |04 Senshi no Omoi (Original Karaoke)]

I am going to call bull on one major newsfeed that appeared on CP24 (Toronto's 24 hour news channel) from 11 - 11:45PM EST on the night of May 10th, 2009. The Tamil community and supporters have launched another impromptu contained protest; protesting on a major highway (for those who know the GTA, they're protesting on the Gardiner) which serves as a major flow of traffic for the city of Toronto. The one reporter decided to go ahead and pull an entire 'but this affects Torontonians on the ground, their commute to work, etc.'.

You know what, news reporter? It would be great if you could check your goddamn class privilege at the door for these people who are fighting and vocalizing the entire despair of the civilians who are dying in the internal conflict in Sri Lanka. That decades-long conflict is hugely complex, and in order for justice to be done there needs to be a dialogue-based compromise based on their own desires and justice. Both people of the Sinhala ethnicity and the Tamil people need justice. People who now have no food, no water, and no access to life or justice or any sense of democracy. People whom have had no access to any sort of education in order to learn what social justice is.

And you, sir, have decided it's appropriate to worry about the commute to work the people of Toronto and the GTA have tomorrow because these people are vocalizing the want to have people's lived saved. And the talk of strategy! 'Waiting it out' and the like. Here's how to solve the protest - realize that this community is acting for a reason and work toward including that community goals as a priority. Less important, more important - the actual thing that matters is acting. And you think it's appropriate for the issues of people who can afford cars and gas and the like to be the primary reaction to this news? The first note the news cast continues to bring up is 'What about people's commutes getting to work tomorrow?'.

Oh, and oh. Oh and they keep mentioning how women and children are at this protest. Understandably, the safety of children with the consideration of their agency is a priority - but it's also a priority to the protesters. The fact that they're presenting it as the fact that it's not is disgusting, reeking of the institutional racism at work here. Stop focusing on the fact that there are children here; because it completely dehumanizes the entire community active at this protest.

And way to go including women in that category, re-enforcing a lovely misogynist notion that the ladies' tiny pink brains can't handle anything! Oh noes, what aboot the stoopid wimmins! Shut the fuck up. Women are people. Freakin' treat them like it. Tamil woman have been at the forefront of this organized protest; and have consistently been the loudest rallying voices here. Way to wipe their contribution of the board.

Though there is this one absolutely badass 16 year old young woman who is not holding back at all - noting that all blood spilled is their blood, and this is genocide and that she cannot in good conscious just go to school and pretend nothing is happening. She needs to do this. I fucking applaud you, young lady. You are badass. The reporter decided to have the gall to ask about the race and class privilege (What about a woman who can't find parking?), and she just tore into her - 'I understand, but it's our people who are dying out there and you all have basic human rights and are treated like dignity and they don't even have that'. And again, the reporter (a white woman) completely obliterates the actual content of what the young woman said by re-capping and summarizing the exchange by focusing on her age and how amazing it is for her being so young and leading this protest.

And they keep using the note that there are women and children at this specific protest as it being not peaceful! Specifically, it's been said that 'previous protests by this group have been peaceful, but there are now women and children here'. What the fuck.

And stop using the word claim. You might as well say 'The Tamil people want to keep their message alive; those dirty brown liars'.

Considering the fact that CP24 just brought up the fact that the Gardiner is partially here as 'good news' when there hasn't been any note of response or acceptance of the requests and demands being made by the Tamil people is indicative of where CP24s focuses lie.

But there seems to be some positivity to note about this. I learned (about 7 hours after the original newscast, so I'm not sure when this was announced) that leader of the Liberal Party Michael 'Iggy' Ignatieff has vowed to make the genocide & civil war a top issue when the ministers meet next. Honestly, this claim may go nowhere - another Canadian federal election is coming, and Iggy is up for Prime Minister. But I do hope he goes through with it.
linkLeave a comment!

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]