More CHAnges to come! [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
More CHAnges to come! - An anti-oppression feminist personal journal.

[ CHAnges - An LGBTQI2S Feminist-friendly Space. | Click Here for CHAnges. ]
[ Questions, etc.? | Click Here for Contact Info & the FAQ. ]
[ Past Entries? | Click for the Archive. ]

Reversing female characterization tropes! P3P speculation! [Aug. 22nd, 2009|10:32 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Audio |Macy Gray - Do Something]

So, I am all over this and the like. In light of the OP animation and the conspicuous placement of Fuuka and Aigis (as well as the inclusion of Jung & the butterfly effect in the text); I began speculating. Here are my posts ganked from a GameFAQs thread I made concerning such.

----

So, we've seen that in the new OP animation; there's quite a few (or at least two) distinct differences in the mirror images. While the Shinji/Mysterious-Other-Guy/Ken one is interesting; the one that really has me interested are the two parallels between Aigis and Fuuka.

The most telling part is near the end of the entire OP, where everyone is mirrored left and right - except for Fuuka and Aigis, who move as though they're mirror images of each other.

It makes me wonder (read: hope) that Fuuka takes a more prominent role as a plot-inducing character. She may not be playable (though that would be a welcome development), but having a more notable role wouldn't hurt (and she wasn't exactly lacking in terms of characterization in the first one; she functioned more-or-less as the one who didn't have major issues for most of the game).

Also, it'd be badass if she more-or-less fell in love with the MShe as Aigis did with MC. I mean, Fuuka was pretty (wonderfully) gay in the MC story - she was all turned on with Mitsuru's smooth skin, Natsuki; hell, even the FES thing with Yukari stripping her...

....

What about US GAY PEOPLE who would love to play any side and have legitimate fantasies like FUUKA FALLING IN LOVE WITH MSHE being affirmed? Or are you saying you speak for all girls, ergo making women who are attracted to women whom play video games invisible?

....

Its alright; I'm sorry I resorted to such a tone so quickly. I'm relatively wary of the double-standard-institutional-sexism-and-homophobia thats pretty endemic to alot of GameFAQS, but thats no excuse for the way I behaved.

See, I don't think that possibility is stupid. Personally, Fuuka reads as a character who will or would very much 'come out' in the future. There were the hints I listed above, and a few others I can't recall right now. This isn't to say there's a checklist (there's no 'BAM' 'BAM' 'BAM' 'LBGT-IDENTITY'), but rather she exhibits quite a few traits that other characters whom've come out in fictional media have displayed. Its not just me, myself and quite a few of my friends (lesbian, gay men, bi women, etc.) whom have seen the game feel Fuuka, of all the cast, is the one most likely to come out (in terms of, like I said, borderline-standardized cues from a to-be-gay character).

From the Answer, I felt it was relatively clear that Aigis was in love with the MC (whether or not 'in love' is romantic or sexual in nature, but she's pretty clearly loving him). Even with that development, she shared a very specific bond with the MC - that in which she is the person who actively tied him to his past. I think it would be sweet for the MShe to develop such a bond with Fuuka, who was generally left out in terms of major emotional pairings via endgame (of course, this was a positive element too; as Fuuka was pretty clearly the one character who was healthiest about approaching a life outside of SEES). And if it were romantic, I don't see a problem with that - almost all of the social links developed could recognizably lead to romantic bonds anyway; they all lead to such a close bond that a romantic development from such a deep friendship wouldn't be unthinkable.

.....

Well, I believe that actually may happen. Maybe for some reason, Natsuki as a character is eliminated from the game - and then the closest bond that Fuuka develops in-story is with MShe. Subsequently, perhaps Aigis may have a different role entirely -

This is (major), speculation, but... we've seen that Pharos and Ryoji still retain a male form in the MShe side; and (in terms of visual design) one can infer that their appearances are predicated on their physical connection to MC... I think that (especially in relation to the various text in the OP that others have wonderfully documented) the MC (with messiah-like abilities) actually may have created this sort of alternate version of himself in order to find a way in which in some world, he didn't have to sacrifice himself and could live in the world with his friends. MShe's story may actually be that.

But before I get sidetracked, having MShe's closest bond be with Fuuka isn't something improbable. They just have to write-out Natsuki.

.....

If it is that, they may justify it with something like - he can create alternate realities, but he can only put the pieces together; he can't control the outcome. It makes sense, in terms of physics and the like. But if they do as such; I really hope they have some sort of acknowledgment from him (or Pharos or the like); something along the lines of not regretting the choices he made because making choices and doing is living, ergo he can live his life with regret because he remains fully committed to his choices.

He's allowed to see what could have happened, but all the memories of his life are so precious that even if he could take the chance and relive his life without making that sacrifice - he wouldn't make that choice, because he was happy and proud of the life he lived. Or something along those lines.

With the Fuuka falling for Jin; I actually had a similar idea if not with Yukari. Remove the MC and alot of her own character development (outside of what she growth she causes in Mitsuru) is removed. In order for Yukari to grow into a healthy person (as opposed to the relatively selfish person she was in the beginning of the game), she may need a development a la Junpei with Chidori. Ergo, Jin and Yukari.

.....


That's exactly why - remove Natsuki, and some key elements of Fuuka's development are removed. Replace Natsuki with the MShe, and Fuuka's emotional foil is you!

.....

I was thinking about xxxHolic and TC myself when the OP came out - animations like such are incredibly deliberate; and what alot of people consider aesthetic are actually very specifically decided clues. Direction and such - all the work put into animation we don't consider - actually contribute to it. Add this to the we-now-realize-lampshading in the original P3 OP and I think alot of the terms they shared are intentional in their choice.

And that idea makes much, much more sense - Elizabeth actually being the one beyond this alternate reality, because if things such as a death or the like occur in the universe; we don't have Messiah-Minato claiming responsibility as it was Elizabeth. This keeps all the MC canon in place, etc.

I doubt that MShe's story will have the same ending, because consistently the Persona narratives have presented what-appears-to-be a trope-filled story and then subverted it like mad. It's a very, very common trope that female characters in RPGs (and narratives overall) are often sacrifical lambs (self-chosen or otherwise) to caretake for the entire world, or be gate keepers (barrier maidens). If anything, Atlus - whose games have always subverted stereotypical female characterization, or at least really expanded on them - will turn the 'sacrificing one's soul' part right on its head.

But even if this does end up being the same story with a few changes, I won't mind because P3's narrative is that good already.
linkLeave a comment!

RePost: My thoughts on the depection of women in Musou games. [Aug. 13th, 2009|08:50 am]
[Tags|, , ]
[Audio |Fonogenico - Reason]

Archive Day! Yes, it's been a while since I've posted - a long while, and I hope my Twitter has proved somewhat sufficient. At any rate, I forgot I had this and was reminded when Rydain posted a great analysis of why the DW6 designs work in some cases and don't in others. This reminded me of this post I had made at KoeiWarriors concerning the depiction of women in the Musou games.

EDIT I'll have to re-add the links that are missing later. For now, enjoy!

-------

Interesting point: can male KOEI characters be considered sex objects? Hmm...

Yes, they can. Male characters and men can be objectified - objectification happens when a person or persons are treated as tools and lacking in agency or personhood. Specifically, sexual objectification happens when a person is objectified - and the standards of worth for the object are how sexually arousing they are.

Sexualization is different from sexual objectification in terms of characters, because a character can have agency but still be directed or rendered within a peice of media in a way that focuses on (culturally-defined) sexual situations or areas of the body.

A strong example of a sexualized character with agency is Natsume Maya from Tenjou Tenge; she's drawn and depicted in a manner where she has strength of will and the capacity to make desicions but the direction of media often makes her breast, buttocks or crotch the focal point of many peices she's in.

A Musou-specific example of a character who is sexualized but has agency is SW1's Nouhime. She had a clear personality that was predicated in her own goals and personhood, but much of the art and direction of her movements were focused on her sexually provocative mannerisms.

I have my own thoughts on the subject of how women are portrayed within the Musou games; my perspective and reading of the games come from my experiences as a radical feminist and a person involved with social justice, as well as a person who is involved with communications and franchising. So, as much as it may seem a bit... strict, I'm going to lay out a few ground perspectives I am working from. I am sharing these because if you disagree with these fundamental beliefs, that's alright - it's just that you will not enjoy the rest of my post or agree with the base points at all, so it may be better to just skip it.

1) Women exist and live within an international culture that assumes they are less capable and able within times of war.

2) Misandry is not feminism. Feminism has never been about hating men. However, misandry - as troubling and destructive as it is - does not have the institutional power that sexism & mysoginy do.

3) Within forms of oppression, there tend to be four difference practices to it - Interpersonal, Institutional, Cultural, and Personal. This is a primer that explains the four within the context of homophobia. There is a very prominent sub-category in Personal known as Internalized -Ism.

Alright, with that out of the way...

KOEI's Musou games have female characters that both break tropes and re-enforce tropes.

I'll start by focusing on one huge problem in franchises with lots of characters like this - tropes. Tropes are bad. Female character tropes are even worse. Tropes are not Archetypes. Every character is predicated in an Archetype - the way that we overcome an Archetype becoming a Trope is by expanding on the characterization. There is never too much characterization as long as the characterization is meaningful and connotatively makes sense to us the audience.

One of the most common tropes that apply to the Musou games (being an action oriented series) is applying the Virgin/Whore dichotomy within the context of battle.

Virgins ('good' women, decidedly virginal and thus not 'bad' AKA morally ambiguous) are given long-range weaponry - bows or magic, for the most part. This tends to happen because a Virgins ability to have morality is predicated on her staying pure; and the Virgin stays pure by not getting touched (and thus not becoming involved in the physicality of battle). The bows from DW6, and Gracia's bracelet attacks are examples of such.

Whores ('bad' women, have active open sexual appitites and are thus 'morally ambiguous') are given hand-to-hand weaponry; but it's often in the form of speed-focused weaponry or tricks. Whores are culturally attunded to being underhanded and conniving; that's why female assassins tend to be coded as whores - using their sexuality as a weapon. Noh is easily the best example of such.

The other very popular trope is to give the girl-child characters weapons which are hand-to-hand, but they handle them in such an anachronistic manner that they aren't visually coded as weaponry at all.

Tropes are detrimental in many ways; I will focus on how tropes are detrimental in a franchise sense. They're problematic because all the characters end up being exactly the same. That's boring to us in the audience because it means that the individuality of the individual is removed; rather it never existed. Thus, in order for KOEI to maximize the interest in the franchise; the characters must be diverse and meaningfully so.

There are many, many positive factors in how KOEI portrays the women characters in the Musou series. The biggest I've noticed are;

1) There is a relatively large amount of diversity in terms of personality, attitude and appearance. They are distinct from each other outside of appearance; they have distinct speech patterns, beliefs, and attitudes. KOEI's women often break the tropes that have been set for female characters. Noh, while very much predicated in the 'Whore' category, has enough character to break as such. Ina is a character that actively breaks the trope by having strength of moral, but also by being desicive (and very importantly, uses her bow in an upclose upfront manner).

2) All of them have the strength of will and the level of agency to act on the accord of their own beliefs. They all make the active desicion to fight.

3) There are is a great deal of diversity in how the women characters interact with each other (applies primarily to WO; not so much the core games) - there are friendships, antagonistic relationships, rivalries, etc.

However, there are problematic trends;

1) An overwhelming amount of narratives for the women that are predicated on being inspired by, dependent on, or solely motivated by male characters in their lives. (In the core games, women interacting with other women is scarce.)

2) The design sense for the women, with few exception, consistently dress them in minimal or no armor. One could argue that the stylistic nature of games shows the lack of nessecary armor, the fact that the male characters are quite frequently dressed in armor (especially when the female characters already exist in a context where they aren't taken seriously in war) condemns this moot. The exceptions to this are Yue Ying (Pre-DW6 had sufficient armor (even if DW5 wasn't coded as such); DW6 has practical but minimal) and Tachibana Ginchiyo.

3) In the core games, rivalries and antagonistic relationships between women are the primary form of interaction between women. The SW games have Ginchiyo & Ina, but one caveat compared to the Sekigahara Melee stages is minimal and dangerous. The DW games rarely have the women interact period (despite there being potential to do so; Shangxiang and Yueying could easily have become buddies, etc.). The Qiao sisters are another minor exception (we barely see them interact with each other; their stories focus on their husbands interaction).

4) Women whom have open sexual appitites are primarily coded as sexually ambiguous or as 'airheaded'. Noh is coded as incredibly sexual but openly acknowledges such; the more surprising example is Zhen (who, being affilliated with the 'bad' kingdom needed to be the 'bad' girl). Nene, having an openly sexual relationship with her husband, is coded as not even recognizing as such.

5) They're all coded as attractive within culturally-defined beauty standards. All of them. There is not one 'unattractive' woman in the bunch. Part of this is predicated on the fact that many of these women were noted for their great beauty, but even the women who weren't were coded as attractive. There's no excuse for this; it's represensible.

6) They rarely meaningfully affect the tide of the battle in an overt sense, and are rarely commanders. This is again tied to the understanding that one does not want to muck up the narrative too much; however there are many minor stages where the women could lead or have a starring role in an overt sense. Yue Ying aided with the Wood Oxen in Wu Zhang Plains, but it's only referenced in her narrative - and it won't make or break the battle.

So, we've identified the problems! These can be easily fixed, really. But one major question comes up!

How do you create a female character that is both historically & culturally accurate and is an interesting character with agency?

Well... you don't.

You don't as the historical narratives are predicated as women either being tools or superflous; but rather you create a character inspired by the cultural understanding of such. So you don't make a narrative that's almost exactly what happened to Noh, but you take the folktales and popular understanding of Noh and make her an interesting character from that.

For those interested, I use this as a checklist. Look and apply to the female Musou characters, and see what you come up with.

I have to finish this up, so I will post these points as well.

Focus on creation of women as people first, but don't forget that the way that women are treated within the cultural context - being a woman is part of who they are, not all of who they are.

Characters are all archetypes; what differentiates a character from stereotype is level & amount of characterization that breaks type at a closer level.

The coding of popular characters as archetypes predicated in sexualization isn't a problem (archetypes are inherently sexual!); it's when the sexualization overrides the character that is problematic (again, Noh is sexy! But she's not only sexy.)

More characters = greater chance of diversity, higher chance of interest.
Less characters = more attempts to shoehorn, less diversity, less interest.

And for the record; my own reading of all the games? WO1 & 2, as a whole, are by far the most female friendly & feminist friendly Musou games there are.
link2 comments|Leave a comment!

A bit of a change! [Aug. 3rd, 2009|03:10 pm]
[Tags|]
[Audio |Orange Pekoe - Yuragi]

As you can all see, I've nary updated in two weeks for various reasons. Since it makes no sense for me to try and keep a schedule that clearly isn't working; I've decided on a new plan. For shorter, more consistent updates - you can follow my Twitter! Then, I'll try to update weekly with a piece of writing on here. I'm going to work on this new plan very diligently, since Twitter fits into my schedule much more easily.
link1 comment|Leave a comment!

Gaia, creating our own mirrors and choice. [Jul. 18th, 2009|09:13 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Audio |paris match - Time Shade]

One opinion that has always stood out to me as being particularly freeing and wise came from my best friend Catherine, concerning Gaia. I don't even remember how this came up (though I can imagine a context up pretty well), and it stood me good ground to this day.

'I've seen kids cosplaying their avatars, and that's kind of horrifying. You aren't your avatar. You aren't.'

With the fluidity of identity that's being thrust upon us with the new options of online identity and interactive social areas like Gaia or NewLife, a person whom isn't completley (or even on a process of) loving their own physical identity can be caught up in a very, very dangerous context. Gaia, for example, offers thousands of options in terms of manipulation of your basic avatar - changing skin, eye, feet... you name it, and you can most likely change it.

What can't you change?

Your default body shape.

Think about the above in this manner - no matter what choices you make or the like in terms of altering your digital physical appearance, Gaia (and any other site which allows as such) has forced upon you a default body type. That default body type? Thin and gendered. For women, it's dainty posture. For men, it's flat-footed fight-clenching posture. The posture for the women indicates daintyness; this isn't posture that communicates action. The men's posture does. It falls back into basic gender codings via Male Gaze - women are for looking it, and men are for doing things.

Even Gaia (which in terms of clothing option and the like is wonderfully progressive) falls to such a practice, for many reasons (technically, it's incredibly incredibly difficult to create pixel-based clothing which can be manipulated in size, and in terms of production time as a business, it's far quicker to do it for the one body type). Gaia does not exist in a vacuum; it's art team pulls inspiration from many sources and they are clearly learned in terms of art history and various cultural aesthetics. They've also come quite a way since 2003; actively altering their designs (or, in some cases, leaving them the same) for each gender identity to be inclusive of various body types and postures. It's always very fulfilling to see a design team recognize and work towards being more inclusive of their userbase. Another indicator of such is when Gaia introduced two more skin tones for it's avatars (bringing the total up to six). This was the first time I'd ever encountered anything actively including more diversity in skintone rather than decrying such an act. Considering most pixel avatar sites still only have 1 or 2 skintones, this was more or less the act that solidified me to Gaia in an ideological way.

In terms of paper mirrors and affirming one's identity through media however, this system of choice can be very dangerous because this can affirm the detrimental belief that if you don't have this body type, your body is wrong. When new users sign up for Gaia, a great number of them - trained via media and cultural consumption to hate their bodies - will find solace in the option that they can make their body as they please. They can latch on to what they feel their body should have been, as opposed to loving one's body for what one is. It reminds me of a quote from Kate Harding (via Lessons from the Fat-O-Sphere) that I use frequently;

There's a big difference between saying you can't be anything other than what you are right now and you don't have to be anything other than what you are right now.

While Gaia doesn't actively decry other body types, it does little to nothing to glorify or celebrate fat bodies or bodies with limbs missing or the like. Furthermore, while the amount of choice available does create cognitive dissonance with those whom are very much structured to conservative heteronormative practices of Gender clothing coding - it doesn't actively encourage cognitive dissonance when dealing with body shape. Gaia's a playground with invisible rules - follow this body shape, but everything else is up for grabs.
linkLeave a comment!

Legend of Chun-Li Deleted Scenes were Deleted?! [Jul. 13th, 2009|08:46 pm]
[Tags|, , ]
[Audio |Orange Pekoe - Yuragi]

Oh, my mind has not been focused on many matters as of late beyond the personal. So here's a personal update, for the sake of both my sense of commitment and for the sake of writing in general! Ha!

Today, I tried something with my hair! You can't really tell, since my head is all black and shiny, but I wore a headband - not pictured - and spiked out everything that the headband didn't pull back. It's totally a lazy-person's version of Huang Zhong's awesome, awesome hair. Since I don't have long enough hair or the hours to put my hair into tiny separated streams, so I improvised. Tons of fun.

I bought The Legend of Chun-Li on DVD; and definitely the first thing I want to bring up are the deleted scenes, and the fact that my first reaction was "Why the frig did they delete these when they would have cleared up so goddamn much?". I mean, no - this does not make up for Chris Klein's performance, but wow did it add so much. All of it.

First of all; in about 5-10 seconds at most, they managed to add quite a bit of depth to Charlie's character. This sort of angst presented in integral to the archetype that Chris Klein plays; in order for this overacting tough guy who looks like a caricature to be taken seriously, we have to find out that the bravado is a caricature to cover up the pain. No, it's not an innovative archetype but the pain is necessary to make it at least a successful one. Why they removed this when it added depth to Nash and thematically linked him to Chun-Li in a way that actually mattered? Mind. Blown.

The most important scene cut was of Chun-Li and Gen conversing; having dinner and linking all of Chun-Li's various narrative ties together. First of all, it acknowledged the randomness of Gen's non-death openly; which totally would have helped in the actual acceptance of his return. But more importantly, it's this scene that ties together the Chun-Li of Hong Kong and the Chun-Li of Thailand - she's accepting the heritage of her father figures, and subsequently - of her own efforts and will - become a hero that synthesizes both the order of the Web and her father's teachings. She's the Spinning Bird; the hero of the streets who won't be caught. I love that so freaking much; my mouth dropped when I first saw this scene. Why on earth did they cut it out?!

Not all that was cut was beneficial to have in the film, though. Of course I'm talking about the pseudo-romantic lingering touch-gaze bit that Chun-Li and Nash had. That certainly didn't do anything for me; I'd much rather them develop the relationship into something similar in the film. Sibling-like, completely. I enjoyed that. I also don't mind that they ended up chopping out a return to Hong Kong to investigate the White Rose; since that would have downplayed her actual return home somewhat. Nash was the character who benefited the most from this scene, though. I also enjoyed seeing more Cheng Pei Pei. Her role was small but clearly badass.

Another scene that would have really solidified Chun-Li's status as a hero of the street was the scene with her stealing back the money from the thug in the clothing shop. The scene isn't notable in terms of execution or anything (though it is fun), but what it does do is show us the status quo. That was one of my issues with the film, we needed just one or two more scenes of Chun-Li being involved in these people's lives directly; and being a hero to them. We were told as such and there were offhand instances here and there, but a scene like that? It gives us a sense of solidarity with where she is now. Interspersing that scene within a scene of her training with Gen or the like would have benefited so much.

I just... I'm so glad I bought the DVD. I think I may buy another copy just because I enjoy this so much. Seriously. I can't believe how much I love this feminist camp Chun-Li. I was telling my best friend Catherine on the phone that I really think I may come to enjoy this Chun-Li alot more than my current affection for the traditional SF Chun-Li. Alot of it has to do with the combination of Chun-Li's feminism and activism, Kristen Kreuk's active feminism, and the fact that the movie advocates alot of principal that I love. It's such a clear deconstruction of Patriarchy. I love it dearly.

And I still want the Spinning Bird pendant badly; but that will clearly be one of those never-get-items. Ha!
linkLeave a comment!

X-Men ramblings! [Jul. 7th, 2009|08:19 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Audio |Mao Denda - Bitter Sweet ~Bedtime Version~]

Instead of posting something worth substance; I decided to indulge my current escapism and rant about various thoughts I'm having about the X-franchise and the like - including Wolverine and the X-Men thoughts, looking at earlier 00s issues, and more.

  • As much as I abhor Reginald Hudlin's handling of Storm in the mainstream universe, one of the reasons I was so frustrated was because - and I only remembered this as of ten minutes ago - that his first handling of Ororo was incredible. I would pull the pages and just show you, but since I'm trying to find preview pages posted in... 2005; I'll just include the dialogue. This was from Black Panther Vol 4 issue 7; which was a House of M tie-in issue (thusly, this character is Queen Ororo of Kenya rather than Ororo Iqadi T'Challa-Munroe of the main Marvel Universe) and the context is a scene where Magneto and Quicksilver are watching television;

    On the television; scene of malnourished child.

    Voiceover: This is Africa, as we once knew it - a continent of starvation, tribal warfare, disease and drought...

    Image of child changes to highrise skyscrapers and mechanized farming.

    VO: ...And this is Africa today, with mutant leadership replacing corrupt human rule. Literacy is up, unemployment is down, and peace is breaking out everywhere. From basket case to the world's breadbasket, Africa is on the move! Today on "Alison", we have an exclusive interview with the woman who made this change possible - Queen Ororo of Kenya!

    Alison Blaire: Queen Ororo, would you agree that Africa is the best example of how life is better under mutant rule?

    Queen Ororo of Kenya: There's no doubt that various regimes exploited Africa terribly. From the slave trade to apartheid, Africa has been a victim to a series of moral abominations condoned by world governments, religions and businesses.

    AB: Well said!

    QO: Magneto has installed leadership that actually cares about the people on this continent, and for that, we are grateful. I am very, very proud of being a mutant. But I do not believe that the mutant gene includes some inherent moral superiority. Mutation is a scientific fact, not a character statement.

    AB: Perhaps you might want to explain what you mean so some viewers don't get the wrong idea... heh heh...

    Magneto: Yes, explain yourself, you traitorous wench!

    Quicksilver: Father...

    QO: Gladly. Castro once claimed that racism was a natural byproduct of capitalism, and that the communist system would naturally eradicate prejudice. Wrong.

    M: You can't compare the two! Humans really do hate difference!

    QO: No "ism" is going to fix the persistence of prejuduce without specific solutions. We have to acknowledge that the myth of white supremacy continues in the mutant-controlled world.

    AB: What do you mean by that?
    M: What do you mean by that?

    QO: I mean the ideal is still a white person with a human appearance. I haven't noticed any furry, feathered or scaled beings deliver the news, have you?

    Q: Good point.

    AB: Er, enough with politics... What's going on in your love life?


    At which point Magneto smashes the TV - and despite the relatively crappy characterization he received; I honestly adored these two pages. They were incredible! To see Ororo - who since '75 has been a constant presence in terms of being a woman of colour as well as an established hero in her own right - actively recognizing, speaking up against and acknowledging white supremacy (and recognizing it's existence in the context of cross-sectionalism) is incredible! While the lack of Feminism or Womanism mentioned is troubling; and leads to... well, this. A presentation that renders Ororo as childish instead of as childlike. I may write more about this, but I'll say that for all of Reginald Hudlin's admirable work in addressing white supremacy within a Western context, he completely re-enforced the problematic misogynistic themes that exist within male-dominated black empowerment movements. And my opinion of her current marriage can be expressed succinctly via a quote from stormantic in the above linked entry;

    Here’s the thing. I love Storm and Black Panther together. I have always liked the idea of them as a couple. However, I am not a fan of how quickly Marvel rushed them into marriage.


  • I actually really, really liked the status quo during Reload. This isn't to say I didn't like the previous era (despite Grant Morrison's de-rail of Magneto and the likely-editorially mandated killing of one of my favourite characters) - I adored the latter half of X-Treme; there were incredible themes and ideas expanding there. Ororo creating her own branch of the X-Legacy by creating the XSE (internationally sanctioned UN mutant marshals), most of the original New Mutants joining the team, Rogue having no powers and being incredibly cool, possible return of Psylocke, and most of all - international traveling!

    That being said, Wow - did I forget how many ideas I enjoyed during Claremont's third run at Uncanny. Betsy returning the way she did, Ororo flirting with both Kurt and Logan and beginning to relish her anger (compared to simply embracing it beforehand), Sage returning to the Hellfire Club to make sure Sunspot stayed on their side, Emma being written in a likable way... Granted, this was offsetted by ideas I didn't enjoy (Rachel reading much, much less competent and younger; X-23 growling and again, feeling less competent; Bishop being Bishop) but for the most part I really did adore it. And the Andy Park arc! The art was lovely, to the point I remember a friend of mine bringing up how I'd like it because of the fashion. I loved the school and the exploding population ideas from pre-ReLoad mixed with the primary colour fun of ReLoad. And then House of M happened. And it wasn't even good (as an event, as a universe it has serious potential; note the above Queen Ororo of Kenya bit).

    Also, New X-Men. I adored those kids, and I was heartbroken when Marvel just up and announced new writers and not even acknowledging that the previous writers were kicked off. I actively stopped buying New X-Men at that point, because it was just the worst kind of insult. It was also of little to no interest to me, what with my favourite characters being de-powered or (literally) blown up in a bus. This isn't to say that Yost & Johnson aren't talented writers - after they disgustingly cleared house they made new engaging characters, and Yost specifically gave me a great joy - whenever I think about the title, my heart hurts a little. Especially when I think of how DeFilippis and Weir were treated.


  • Ah, Wolverine and the X-Men. What a strange little show - it's a show that is predicated in two very different areas. In marketing, Wolverine has to be the leader of the team. In narrative, Wolverine has to be a terrible leader (because he's Wolverine). How do you reconcile the two? By throwing the X-Men in losing situations all the time, and making their two actual leaders look like chumps in two main ways - emotionally (Cyclops) or in battle (Storm). Whereas Wolverine has skills in both, is clearly more suited to battle, but the team just sucks so much compared to him that he can't help but be leader? The plotting in the show is a bit clearer, but I don't really care in that Storm really become one of those constant background characters. Scott is given a lengthy and meaningful reason for his relative incompetence (Jean is missing, and it's shown that Jean is the primary figure that allowed Scott to overcome his emotional awkwardness). Ororo? We see in the 4th episode that she's actually doing what most superheroes should be doing in their spare time; being active in the international community and using their abilities to improve the quality of life for everyone. Then she returns to the team because she sees that making sure the world doesn't become a hellhole in 20 years is a bit of a priority.

    Otherwise, it's mostly her getting kicked in the head or failing to turn around while a Sentinel blasts her. Although, there is one more episode she gets serious screentime in - and it's a bit of a shock why; though I've grown to love it.

    The season introduced Angel rather early on; but he only joins the time in Episode 17. In episode 18, his title episode, one can pretty clearly infer that him and Ororo are romantically involved! Kind of from screens like this. And Ororo making flirting faces like this. And them flying around together. This is an idea that's been toyed with before - most notably in Ultimate X-Men 40. Unfortunately for her, this is the episode that Angel has his wings amputated and is then turned into Archangel. It's actually a rather openly emotional episode for both of them, and Ororo does have one very touching power display - after Warren refuses to stop attacking his father, she sadly raises her hand and makes a fist... calling a lightning bolt to zap Warren and One hit KO him.

    In terms of her presentation though... I love it. Susan Dalian does a wonderful job with her voice; the few instances we see her range - just watch Overflow & Guardian Angel - she does a phenomenal job; mixing the academic diction Ororo speaks in but using it in a casual performance. Her voice has presence when it speaks, but not in a ham-like manner. It's such a shame that out of the 10 episodes she speaks, that there are only 2 or 3 episodes that she has major lines.

    Her design is great. I love her hair; I love how it has this distinctive shape and it's beautiful and it's actually how long hair grows out for many black and brown people. I love her nose in that the bridge travels outward instead of inward. I'm not a fan of her paperthin waist. I am a fan of her civvies; oh man I love those (and Jean's as well). The character design in the show is of incredibly high quality; considering the number of unique characters introduced in the show - this is a huge success. Incredible job.

    Before I forget, though - I do have to bring up that if there's one character that seriously jobs Wolverine, it's Emma. Wow, Emma just manages to.... I'm not even sure if I dislike her or not. She definitely makes an impression on you one way or another, but I'm generally ambivalent towards her - primarily because there are other characters we could do with seeing other than Emma Frost. Show me Wanda more! Show me Storm more! Show me more Psylocke! But Marvel - at all levels - seems obsessed with shoving Emma down our throats as the prototypical X-Woman. Seriously, I like Emma normally. So this is really frustrating.


  • Of the current books, despite the schedule and the desstruction of Forge - I really enjoyed the first arc of Astonishing X-Men from Ellis. I also enjoyed his characterization and writing of Storm; who takes on a group role I've never seen her take before - that of the nonchalant, slightly bored but gregarious old friend. She's clearly Storm, and she had a plan to get back on the team, but she just feels so much more relaxed and comfortable - of course she has questions, but these queries aren't like Scott's rather drawn out rationalizations (and her character merges rather well with everything that happened in Worlds Apart). They aren't even queries. Rather, just observations. She knows what she's doing, and her moods feel very relaxed. While I adore Claremont, his Ororo is sometimes too serious for his own good while he's communicated that she's fun (successfully, for the most part), I want to see other writers take a shot at writing her as fun. Ellis did. And it wasn't as though she was an airhead, rather she was just relaxed and confident in how she felt without being pompous - her scene with Forge broke my heart. I had alot of fun reading this arc. It's such a shame the delays killed quite a bit of the momentum, but this is still quality.

    And I cannot wait for Jimenez to arrive on the title! Oh, I adore how he renders her. And I love that he's cleaning up her Bianchi costume (which I actually really like, for the most part). I think a Jimenez!rendered Storm will do wonderfully with the flat wit that Ellis has given her. I can't wait to pick up this trade and all it's wish-wash fun.


  • Loving X-Men Forever. Jean's alive. She's well. She's Jean again. I can't wait for more Evil!Not!Storm, as well. She's a riot.
linkLeave a comment!

Quick Update! [Jul. 3rd, 2009|08:42 am]
[Tags|]
[Audio |Imaaji - Inside]

No, I'm not gone nor am I not motivated to write; rather I just don't have the time. The past week and a bit has included;

  • Toronto Pride Weekend, which has spurred many topics including 'Diction within the LGBTQI2S movement', 'Codification via sub-categories', and even 'Why having Goals are better than having Expectations'.

  • As I posted last, my Grandmother is in a home and we're not very thrilled with parts of it. I have quite a bit to bring up in this regard, but in terms of time? I've visited her for at least an hour each day (barring the Weekend and yesterday, and Wednesday I was there from Noon - 7:45PM) everday since she was put in.

  • I'm on summer hours at work! Only for July, which means 8:30 - 5:30 Monday - Thursday, but today, being Friday, I get 9 - Noon.


So I plan to do quite a bit of work on those topics and some other X-Men related ones. But this just to say yes! I am not fading into oblivion.
linkLeave a comment!

Feelings are something we need to embrace and cherish and let go. [Jun. 25th, 2009|01:33 pm]
[Tags|]
[Audio |Stephen Endelman - Opening Credits]

I haven't been writing for a few days; because my energy has been somewhat low. These are exceprts from e-mails I've written that may give you an idea why.

I need to go to the home again tonight; and write up a small itinerary at lunch so the nurses know what to do.

...

It is not easy, though. There's three floors, and she's on the second floor. One of the problems we're trying to fix right now is that the second floor is primarily for late-stage dementia patients, and my Grandmother is mid-stage but is pretty quiet. We kept closing the door because random residents came on three separate occasions and just ... tried to come in, and we're like 'this isn't your room'. And then there was this one older Chinese woman who was -screaming- and -wailing- and -crying- like she was at an old-style funeral. We want to have her transferred to the third floor since it's much quieter and they still do full-care (since my Grandmother's physical capabilities are nil, and the first floor is for the physically independent). In terms of architecture and interior design, the place looks exactly like the inside of a hospital, besides a few more furnishings.

My Mom cried a lot (and is a hugely courageous woman, because she still managed to get through a lot of the work despite how upset she clearly was). I was superpissed at my Aunt (as was my Mom) since my Mom was trying to handle the paperwork and started to choke up, and my aunt was like 'Oh, stop dis stupidness'. My Mother pretty much articulated the right response to me later; 'It's none of her business how and when I cry. Who is she to say that? She wasn't even here, living with her! She barely did anything to help out!'. Of my Mom's siblings, the only ones really with a strong quality of common sense in this context are the three youngest (my Mom, my Aunt who works for the City, and my Uncle from Florida). My Mom feels really guilty - she still doesn't want to do this; the problem is that her own health is decreasing at a consistent and scary rate. I told her (not in this manner, but the message was clear) that it's a difficult choice choosing between her and my Grandmother, but I -will- choose her - no questions asked. Even if she won't.

We're planning to bring her out on weekends as well; like every other weekend at the least. But everything just feels really... out of whack. There's a strange lack of equilibrium.

...

I'm alright; just sort of - the biggest thing for me is developing a schedule that allows me to have my own social life and relish that while still doing justice towards my grandmother by visiting her on a regular basis. I'm developing an unhealthy sense of guilt already towards this, and I need to nip it in the bud because guilt does not help. Working on a plan will.

My Mom brought up the fact that while she's here, we have to be very visible with the staff (who are all awesome; one of the things that are frustrating is that my Mom and I really developed a repore with the staff on the 2nd floor, but not as much on the 3rd). I met the Activity Coordinator with my Mother, and she was really sweet - she carried herself well, very informative and she got along with my Grandmother well. My Mom was suspicious when they told her that they check on them every two hours, but from 3 to 7 we didn't have anyone. I assumed that it was because there was company there, but I'm not sure. They feel fine and they seem incredibly competent and friendly, but I have no experience in this so I don't know how to meaningfully discriminate. They did go out of their way though to actually help us with making the request to transfer floors though; so they definitely aren't openly vicious or the like (they actually recommend transfers themselves when they see a resident who isn't in the appropriate floor, so I hope that helps).

...

Well, she goes to sleep very early - at around 7PM or so. Meals together aren't really any option with work and the like; which is why it's important to bring her out every other weekend. Honestly, doing that and visiting her maybe twice a week will probably be good. It feels like a good amount. Honestly, it's more than I saw her at home - most of the time when I got home she was asleep, and when I left in the morning she was just waking up.

Oh, I do (think about my parents like this in the future). And I know that I won't be able to manage, imagining it right now. I just won't be able to.


As you've probably gathered, my family and I have had to put my Grandmother in a fulltime care facility. This, combined with a Pride that could potentially be incredibly eventful, has really thrown me into a state of unease. I will work through them, but I somehow seem to be finding the strength to work through it. I hope that with my continued effort, this gets easier rather than more difficult. If that isn't the case, I'll still try my best.
linkLeave a comment!

Beyond Human Or Machinery - The X-Men's Karima Shapandar. [Jun. 22nd, 2009|01:35 pm]
[Tags|, , ]
[Audio | - 11. Peaceful Days]

I look for paper mirrors quite a bit - though what's fun is that I can be rather flexible in finding them. I suppose I see a lot of myself in quite a diverse selection of characters. One of the factors that appeal to me in terms of a paper mirror is cultural identity. I identify as West-Indian (ethnically, I'm Indo-Guyanese) - but as a Hindu and a brown person and someone with East Indian ancestors, I find myself drawn to East Indian characters as well. Unfortunately, within Western media, there's a very real and very large lack of Indian characters (and many of them are, unfortunately, very stereotypical in presentation and tone).

That's why I am thrilled with the ongoing dynamic use and inclusion of Karima Shapandar; also known by her X-Men alias Omega Sentinel. A quick primer; Karima Shapandar is an Omega-Prime Sentinel (human beings fitted with nannites so that they become mindless Sentinels) whose original personality and mind were restored to her via the combined efforts of Magneto and Professor Xavier. Previously a detective-inspector in her native Mumbai, she’s now an associate of the X-Men (having been an X-Man, a member of Excalibur, a brainwashed member of the Marauders, and a temporary member of the Acolytes).

Chris Claremont had this to say when asked about her creation and usage;
"I liked the idea of her. The notion... of someone being transformed into a wholly mechanical being and what effects that has on sense of self, sense of soul? She’s an outcast from both human and mutant society, yet bound by her own personal sense of honor to try to protect both. Callisto’s (another character in the Excalibur series) one kind of 'monster,' Karima’s another. They both have their measure of prejudice to overcome."

I adore her narrative; it directly deals with body politics while bringing racist politics and sexist politics along for the ride. One of my favourite aspects of her journey (specifically in Excalibur) is that she was logically going back and forth between aberration and enjoyment in terms of her new status, which cleanly and elegantly lands itself into a clear goal (vocalized in X-Men Vol 2). This is really the most organic way that this could have ended up, because Karima’s consistently demonstrated both a sense of conviction and assertiveness. She’s a police officer. She clearly takes pride in her status and appears to be emotionally tied to her practice of her ethics – clearly upset when she feels she has done something so wrong in a previous life to deserve her new form, but actively engages in psychological healing by working towards a sense of justice and peace. The act of working towards providing justice and peace – by protecting people – would lead her to recognize the great use of her new abilities. Karima can’t undo the past; this has happened and all she can do is heal. And instead of passively falling into despair, she finds solace and healing in taking action – it is very much the practice of Metta (a primarily-recognized-as-Buddhist concept, but is critical in Hinduism (including Shaktism, which Karima seems to practice); actively healing one’s self by acting in the beneficial needs and interests of others.

Subsequently, this leads to an excellent sexist subversion and creates a wonderfully empowering character. Karima may be a victim, but she never actively victimizes herself. Her agency, once in question, is now never in question – while initially there was internal conflict as to what she is, it never became a defeat. That was never a question. Instead, she is active in saving, protecting and fighting for herself and for others. Karima, as a character, while introduced as the love interest of a man, has already overshadowed him and become a notable, fleshed-out character in her own right (and even in her introduction, she was portrayed as an active agent in her life). She was introduced as a person of skill, duty and reliability. And that characterization has continued as such, while she overcame the position of love interest (and as a foil for two older men; as mentioned later). This woman is no Bollywood swooning Indian woman, she is a well-developed character that both relishes her cultural identity and pushes past the stereotypical depictions of it.

For the most part, Karima’s managed to escape being oversexualized and objectified in rendering. Brett Booth, despite a rather unimpressive design, rendered her in a dynamic active manner. Aaron Lopresti rendered her in a wonderful manner (there’s a reason he went on to produce some of the most empowering and respectful Wonder Woman art in the past 10 years) despite a rather odd design; she had clear muscle definition, flat footwear an her posture was not geared towards male gaze T&A shots (though there was at least one odd waist view with ass-boobs view). Chris Bachalo, while not recognizing the muscle definition, managed to portray her with dynamic posture that avoided T&A shots (even when she was nude). Humberto Ramos, unfortunately, did focus on T&A shots but thankfully never got very far due to the full-body coverage of her Bachalo!Design (though we did get some infantilized hairstyles and giant breast shots). Scot Eaton may have had one or two super-curvy-look-ass shots, but they’ve generally been a rarity and never to the point of suspending belief.

The colourist for the Scot Eaton-rendered issues and the Humberto Ramos-rendered issues did, unfortunately, lighten her skin – but never to the point of her original design. I’m frankly very happy that the colourists who worked with Lopresti and Bachalo did make and keep her skin as rather dark; as Colorism is still and issue and it’s incredibly frustrating to see a lack of respect towards the replication of brown skin. I will note that she has not been as much of a victim of this as DC’s Vixen or X-Factor’s Monet, but this is still a very problematic and racist trend. I’m hoping that future appearances restore her skin colour to being as dark as Excalibur-appearances.

While I’ve noted her rendering above; I believe special distinction should be made for her designs (in which there have been primarily 2 specific silhouettes). While her first consistent design (designed by Aaron Lopresti) is rather distinctive, I don’t feel it’s necessarily in a beneficial way. While the outfit itself was rather odd (the strongest visual cue being her silver boots, otherwise it was a rather strange design), the feature to stand out, though, is her hairstyle. While Cliff Richards rendered it in a more natural-appearing manner, it’s just one of the most anachronistic hairstyle choices I’ve seen in that it resembles the movement of dreadlocks (despite it being straight strands of hair). One can see the problem in terms of misidentity – combine a hairstyle that (in silhouette if not texture) is culturally associated with people who are black with a genre that is known for portraying black people as white people with darker skin, and you have a visual coding that leads to blackness. This wouldn’t be a problem if she were a well-fleshed out, breaking-stereotypes black character – but she’s not. She’s most likely of an Indian ethnic group (one of hundreds, if not thousands), and while the Western world doesn't have a lot of hairstyles that are indicative of South Asian hair-that-isn't-imported-from-the-West, choosing hair that has a silhouette as such reads as unintentionally irresponsible when considering visual communication & visual shortcuts. Granted, this could have gone so much worse - he could have gone out of his way to have her wear a full-fledged sari and give her a bindi (despite the, you know, whole not married thing) so this design, showcasing her ease of movement, isn't terrible (and again, he rendered her rather wonderfully, flat footwear, athletic poses and body, etc.). It's just a rather strange choice in terms of what her primary character traits are (cyborg sentinel, cop, Indian, visually-coded as female).

The Bachalo design, however, is something I find as incredibly dynamic and successful - it still manages to give her full body coverage, is meaningfully visually differentiated from the rest of the team (how many X-Men have a combination of white and red and black as their primary colours? None, because that's pretty much Alpha Flight's thing and at this point I'd almost like to see her just join Alpha Flight because she'd visually fit right in). I'm very happy he had went with full body coverage where in this instance, a great number of pencillers would have gone with a close-to-naked design and justified it in story with 'She's a cyborg, who cares what she wears!'. It speaks well of the design when (again, as noted above), other artists have tried to render her in a sexually objectified manner and had trouble successfully doing so via her full-body design. While I would have preferred wavy hair (as pure straight hair like hers is something of a huge rarity in Indian ethnicities), this still isn't bad per say (the hair itself seems pretty thick as is, which is nice). The design is easily recognizable from a distance but doesn't fall apart when up close. It's definitely a rather successful design, so much that I would love to see Aaron Lopresti render her in this design (his rendering is absurdly good, I'm just not a fan of his outfit and character designs as much).

One of the most initially appealing factors for me was the fact that Karima was a practicing Hindu – and as seen here, she maybe a practicing Shaktist (in that the first deity she cried out to was Maadevi). I don’t really have a strong body of characters to which I can actually source as actively identifying as Hindu; my mind tends to go to the (now sadly defunct) Virgin Comics for sourcing Hindu stories (and while it was a great treat; there were some problematic issues – in ‘India Authentic’, the tales involving the goddesses often involved misogynistic tropes (of particular annoyance was Mahasaraswati’s tale), and Devi (while super-awesome) didn’t exactly source the female Hindu or Vedic goddesses (bar Mahadevi), losing a wonderful opportunity to create new interpretations of said goddesses). Otherwise, I tend to draw a blank – and while there are a number of characters inspired by the Hindu pantheon, there aren’t really many known worshippers. Furthermore, as noted above, Karima seems to specifically be a Shaktist (though that’s presumption on my part, in that she hasn’t identified as one per say). This is such a wonderful piece of identity to see; in that Hinduism as a religion tends to not even be portrayed (often the concepts and deities exist, but the worshippers not so much). And when it is portrayed, it’s done so rather clumsily (for a good comparison of the misconception towards Hinduism, check out this article about karma – and then apply the level of misunderstanding to Hinduism & Vedic practice as a whole). While Karima isn’t a perfect example of a practicing-Hindu character (that trait seems to have disappeared entirely during the Mike Carey usage), that fact that it’s an integral factor in her own character arc as well as a source of strength for her was great to see. I really, really hope we see more of her as a practicing Hindu – it’s already clearly established that she’s not fanatical, so consistent-but-not-overbearing-usage of her religious beliefs would be great to see.

One of the interesting notes about Karima’s role in the X-narratives is that she plays a direct foil to both Professor Charles Xavier and Magneto (outside of him being a villain primarily) in a relatively equal manner (as opposed to leaning one way or the other too much). Only a few characters have done as such; Gabrielle Haller, the New Mutants (primarily Dani, Sam, Roberto, Rahne, Amara, Illyana, Doug, and Xian), and possibly Rogue (I hesitate to put Ororo in here; in that despite her getting along with him rather well while he was Headmaster, his subsequent actions in X-Men Vol 2 1-3, and murder of Jean in Planet X probably wiped out the majority of goodwill Ororo had towards him – Rogue is a ‘possibly’, because she was much closer to Magneto than Storm and has also had considerable interaction with Charles). When looking at this list, one can tell very quickly that Karima has a very specific position; different from any of these people – she’s not someone who was a student of theirs (formally, or even for a long period informally), and she was never a romantic interest of either of them. Rather, she’s an adult who has similar training (via her background as a police officer) who was forced into the conflict of mutants VS humans by both her ideological standing and her new status as a living being – which was entirely due to the combined; efforts of both the Professor and Magneto. She’s literally living proof of their potential to bring harmony through co-operation, but this does not rob her of her own personhood; which is notable in that while she’s actively thankful to both of them, she still questions their thinking in a productive manner. Rather than being someone to solely learn from them, Karima actively contributes to both of them – helping them come to new conclusions. Furthermore, she’s an active ally of theirs – rather than support, she’s a front liner (potentially for both of them). It’s an interesting parallel to Rogue, even – one character who’s lived a major part of her life seeking their (potentially failing) help, and one character who’s spent minimal time with them and received an almost total solution (that comparison also makes you feel very, very bad for Rogue). Karima could very, very easily fall into the role of wide-eyed-learn-from-the-white-men ethnic girl (and there have been moments where it’s been close to appearing that way), she has instead been treated as their colleague and friend – someone to respect, care for (when necessary), not infantilize, and recognize as having her own unique body of knowledge which is equally important as theirs. In this manner, Karima herself can be seen as a living example of the X-Dream - even one step further, in that she was forced into a position that should have her killing mutants, but instead works for her own salvation and the salvation of others. There was no question in her human mind that mutants are people, and for a Sentinel to believe this - even if she has a human consciousness - is incredibly poetic.

And poetic contemporary X-Men whom have lasted as long as she has - what with X-world revamps every few months or so - are a rarity. She's managed to stay in use because a number of writers found this gem of a character and worked with her; meaningfully adding her experience and the audiences by including her. She's by far one of my favourite X-characters of all time, and she's only been in published books a handful of times. Karima, rather than draining from the X-mythos like a leech, adds to it in a significant way - by being the sum parts of her heritage and ethics, and adding more. I hope to see her for some time in the future, as a character that may grow in a pace that defies our hectic world. She's definitely a modern-day positive role-model; someone who practices her ethical stance without preaching it to us in a condescending manner. Here's hoping to her growth and beneficial usage as a character, worthy of Maadevi herself.
linkLeave a comment!

Take action with healing. [Jun. 18th, 2009|09:01 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Audio |Masuda Toshio - Kaze no Tamakura]

Since the entry I was planning on posting tonight won't actually be posted tonight (I was writing at at work and accidentally left it there), I've decided to write on something a bit more personal. I want to write about healing action. This is a rather long but poignant excerpt, so please bear with me.

Alan Clements: Experience shows that there is often a lag period between the trauma and the action to overcome it. It's a temporary paralysis of the spirit, so to speak. How can one breathe positive significance into despair and hopelessness? How might one give it spiritual meaning and value and turn it around to make it work in his favor?

Aung San Suu Kyi: Let me try to explain this with a very down-to-earth example. I have often noticed this: when there is a simple household crisis, such as for example, the pressure-cooker bursting and throwing soup all over the kitchen ceiling, my first reaction is: "All right, calm down." Just tackle it. Because if you just stand there saying, "The pressure-cooker has burst and it's spurting all over the place," you can get into an absolute tizz. But my reaction is to say, "Well, there's no point getting into a tizz. I can't wish the soup back into the pressure-cooker simmering away in safety. I've just got to get on with cleaning it up." So I turn off the gas, and then I get a rag to clean up the mess. That in itself calms you down. You've got to work. If you're apathetic or filled with hopelessness and despair you've got to do what you can. I can't do anything about the fact that I have lose half the soup. But I can certainly clean up all traces of the disaster. Then I can start thinking, "Now, should I cook a bit more soup? Or should I supplement it with something else?" You get down to work and don't just stand there despairing. That's what I would say to people who feel hopeless and despairing: "Don't just sit there. Do something."

AC: So, in other words, the positive action itself is the healing?

ASSK: Yes. There's always something you can do if you really put your mind to it. I do believe that.

AC: Do you feel that there is ever a need for intimate discussion about the often traumatizing emotions of despair and grief without being indulgent?

ASSK: Of course there is. After all, the bursting of a pressure-cooker is a very minor crisis. But with big crises, for example the loss of a loved one, I believe that people must be allowed to talk about it and work through their feelings. But at the same time, you must encourage these people to get on with life; not just to sit and grieve over the person they have lost. So you have to give them all the emotional support you can, but also try to find something practical for them to do. Such as, to think of those who are still alive and to do something for them.


The act of healing can be anything, but one of the most practical ways to go about healing is by identifying the part of you that feels despair and then doing something with that to show how amazing it is. For example, one's body. If one is feeling despair over one's body - my body's too fat, it's too tall, it's too acne-prone, etc. - then doing something that uses your body, no matter how minuscule, will really help. You don't overcome the despair you feel with your body by making it thin, but rather by realizing how amazing you're fat body is - look at the systems and actions our bodies ourselves take. It's bloody incredible. Look how much your fat body can do. It can form it's own momentum to pick up a glass and lift it. It can do tai chi. It can hug someone in pain and give them warmth and comfort. Those are all incredible, wonderful things. Even the act of breathing.

One of my personal preferences for healing action is speaking about what I want to be true. Sometimes, I become frustrated at behaviour - if people are selfish, or inconsiderate, or mindlessly insensitive. But one can recognize that by becoming frustrated with that behaviour, one risks misconstruing the act with the person. Therefore, I verbally note that if a person is inconsiderate, or selfish or the like, that they may not mean to have done as such - and if I verbally lambaste them, as I wish to, that I will lose any chance for meaningful emotionally-affirming dialogue which is one of the only methods leading to beneficial long-term growth (both culturally and personally). In ignoring that possibility, I will contribute to a culture that alienates people and teaches them that suppressing the majority of our emotions is the only way to survive. I don't want to contribute to that. It's destroyed too much already. By actually vocalizing it, I bring my listening skills in and I begin to feel what I am saying.

Sometimes I fall into such despair over what I've done or said or acted or just how I live. So I affirm the fact that I am feeling that way, and I do something about it. Like now. The act of me writing this affirms that as much as I may make mistakes in the past or feel unwanted, that by writing I am actively contributing to the promotion of a loving radical feminist politic. By doing this, I am affirming my own feelings and working for the benefit of myself and others. In acting in service of the needs of others, I affirm that I can contribute in a meaningful way to both the world and to that specific person. This will allow my sense of self to make way for selfless intention; the intent to do work for the benefit of others with your focus on them. Meaningful selfless intent (where one acts primarily for the benefit of others, but recognizes self-benefit as well) is different from pathological self-intent (recognized often within people who wish to become martyrs in order to be appreciated or noticed).

Community is also so important in terms of healing. One needs to have others who support them to affirm their own feelings of worth and appreciating the hard work we do as human beings. I believe that this is an area that we, as a species, can improve on - both the open giving of compliments, and the receiving of them. Quite frankly, due to the mass oppression instituted by white-supremacist capitalist ableist Patriarchy, the former is much easier to cultivate than the latter. People of minority status are still justified in feeling a great deal of suspicion towards those of privilege, because the use of compliments is often a strategy the person who is complementing uses in order to get what they want. The only meaningful way to heal such suspicion is by being sincere, respectful and sensitive of the complimented party's agency and personhood. Compliments also only work as affirming motivation if the person has established that their personhood is priceless.

As well, privileged parties should also realize that a compliment is not an end, is as an acknowledgment of the progressive work that one has done thus far. It is not an acknowledgment of permanent success. I believe in complimenting the effort a person has put in, because it vocally affirms the effort put into an act - even if it is the minimum. Life is inherently difficult, and while reaching the minimum may be easy for some it is difficult for others. Acknowledging a person's effort is empowering and empowerful. But we do not give compliments to mark the end of said difficult work. Hard work can and will not disappear because being actively kind, courageous, sensitive and honest is inherently difficult. Compliments must always be followed by a 'continue the effort'. The effort must continue, because the act of contributing to the creation of a loving feminist world is evergoing.

Contributing the the creation of a loving feminist world is in itself a healing act; for ourselves and the world. That is the crux of healing - it may focus on one individual, but the consequences of healing are beneficial for all of us. By focusing on healing our mental health (by affirming social justice for all), and recognizing the interconnectedness of our status as human beings, the act of healing will be the revolution necessary for the human spirit.
linkLeave a comment!

SEGA - A fun fun alternative to KOEI. [Jun. 15th, 2009|08:55 pm]
[Tags|]
[Audio |Raj Ramayya - Strangers]

Alright – so I’m well aware that KOEI can be very disappointing. The latest in a string of annoyances is when I learned that the DW6/SSM5 Empires DLC character leitmotifs were in fact direct rips of the character themes from SM/DW1; ergo the characters who didn’t appear in that game won’t be getting their own themes. As someone who loves character theme music to the point of it being a fetish, this is somewhat disheartening (as I was totally looking forward to a Yue Ying theme).

Thusly, I decided to lick my metaphorical Sangoku wounds by re-acquainting myself with the designs and interpretations from Sangokushi Taisen; a 3K Card siege game developed by SEGA.

Sangokushi Taisen, in terms of the art, is actually a pretty good transition from SSM/DW to see how other artists and franchises depict or interpret these characters. The depth of archetypes they draw from is much more fantastical (and much more visually familiar; often combining typical anime visual tropes as well expanding on traditional Han armor) and they actually go much further in the number of depicted 3K figures. This makes sense, of course – the primary method one sees the character is via the card; since the game is primarily focused on large amounts of foot troops. This lack of designing for an in-game model lets the designers go all out when creating outfits.

The variety in design can be attributed to the fact that there is not a single character designer for the game; rather they ask many famous manga-ka and illustrators to contribute their designs. Often there are multiple artists working on a single character, so you can (and for the most part, do) have multiple character designs for a single character.

And even beyond that, one of the great parts of Sangokushi Taisen is that it actually creates designs for characters not seen in Musou, but don’t have fun high-colour designs elsewhere. For example, Guan Xing & Zhang Bao both have a lovely homoeroticism matching tattoo thing going on. Zhang Fei’s wife and Empress Zhang/Zhang Yi/Xing Cai’s mother is introduced with the name Xiahou Yueji (for those unfamiliar, Zhang Fei’s wife is actually Xiahou Yuan’s daughter – and when I say wife, I mean Zhang Fei kidnapped her when she was gathering wood, but I don’t think they’ll be focusing on that point). Empress Bian (Cao Cao’s wife) is shown as an ehru-playing Cao Cao-heart-melting young woman, and Wu Guotai (Sun Jian’s wife & Sun Ce, Quan, and Shangxiang’s mother) is… well, I’m surprised they actually included her! She looks rather young, compared to how badass and old she should be, but still. Zhang Chunhua, Sima Yi’s wife known for killing a maid who possibly may have heard a secret, looks as cunning and deadly as one would expect. And so, so much more.

Also, Wu and Wei switched up colours! That’s gargantuan!

Sangokushi Taisen is pretty popular with the fanart community – pixiv.net has around 200 pages of fanart. It’s no Sengoku Basara, but it certainly has a following. Plus it’s a great source of detailed, elegant art. SK is far from perfect – the vast majority of the designs of the women involve great deals of sexualization, sexualized archetypes and the male gaze – but I would rather not throw the baby out with the bathwater, because there is some serious potential here. I’d really love to see someone clean up or work with the women’s designs as well – as much as many of the ladies are just sitting there being pretty with no iconography of action (the Qiaos, Wu Guotai, Lady Gan oh my god Lady Gan, Lady Mi, Zhen Luo, Empress Guo Nuwang, Lady Xiangying, Cai Wenji, etc.), there are some really easy ways to further that and actually give them weaponry or some sort of tool.

Furthering upon that point, I’d have to say the masaki design of Sun Shang Xiang and the Kazama Raita design of Huang Yueying ended up being my favourite.

Specifically with Yueying, as much as I loved the CLAMP design she received, other manga-ka working on the same design don’t give it the best charm. Furthermore, they took away a lot of what was cool about the CLAMP design – the various adorable robots and Yueying’s badass wrench and working gloves, for example. As well, even in the CLAMP design – I’ve never really been a fan of interpreting Lady Huang as that young a woman; in that it reeks of the kind of nasty infantalization that happens within Patriarchal Japanese heteronormative sexuality.

And that's not even this scream-inducing one.

Beyond that, the reason that I enjoy the other design is that it emphasizes a factor of Yueying that I enjoy and that chief iconography forgot – that she’s an astrologist. The folktales were the ones that mentioned the machinery and aptitude with invention, but the one description she gets wholeheartedly from Ro3K (courtesy of Kongming’s Archives) is;

His mother, from the house of Huang, had been a woman of undistinguished looks but rare ability who could interpret the constellations and the contours of terrain.

For those unaware, there is a very popular practice known as Astrological Geography. This is most typically manifested in mainstream Western culture via giving each sign cities and countries in which they rule over. However, in both Western and East-Asian practices, Geographical location has a very prominent role in using Astrology for beneficial investigative purposes. Landmass and patterns in the land were understand with the arithmetic created from Astrology. Clearly, one can tell from the passage quoted above that Lady Huang was indeed a practiced Astrologist. And subsequently (given the time period), she would be involved with invention and political advising. But those two skills most likely (again, given the context and the fact that Lady Huang is a woman in said context) were borne of her mastery of Astrology.

What’s also important in the above passage is that she was of undistinguished looks, AKA she was not conventionally attractive. What most designers with her do at this point is make her look Caucasian – in that Caucasian looks are often attributed, traditionally, to vulgarity. This also works in the context of still making her conventionally attractive in a modern sense, because there’s the glorification of whiteness in much of East Asia. Ergo, by giving her a design that’s clearly inspired by count dresses and what-feel-to-be-French fashion before the Revolution, you create a very neat design that’s evocative of both mental deductive prowess and astrological inventiveness. To me, Yueying's looks are evocative of something like being the head of a Salon that focuses on metaphysical phenomenon, using it as a front for the mostly-patriarchal Golden Dawn or something.

This isn’t to say that this design of Yueying’s isn’t problematic, though – I don’t think I even need to utter the word ‘cleavage’ with you recognizing the completely inappropriate cleavage that was shoved in. Specifically in the second rendition of the design, it is so out of place that it’s clearly the biggest detriment to the design. Despite the monstrous boobary, I like the design – but I still consistently grit my teeth at it.

Sun Shangxiang, well – for those who know me, I haven’t made it much of a secret that I abhor the design they gave her in SSM5/DW6. I find it dreadful, and even in terms of it being cute fashion, the part that really ruins it is that god-awful petal dress. Even some awesome argyle kilt or the like would be so much better than blooming-bum-skirt. Sun Shangxiang, in all the literature I’ve read on her, has consistently been presented as enthusiastic, optimistic, snarky, and incredibly competent. Those are positive traits. More importantly, they aren’t inherently childish traits.

I understand KOEI’s rationale of coding her as the youngest of the three featured Sun siblings (especially in the context of what an empowered young woman appears as), but it does her no justice to brand her with that backwards-Pussycat-Dolls-non-feminism and then present her as the primary woman character in the game. If anything, it just serves to make her look ridiculous in the eyes of actual feminists while alienating people who may like her because of her identification with feminism. But before I become sidetracked, that’s a short explanation of why I dislike SSM5/DW6 Shangxiang (and I wasn’t too keen on the previous version, either), but for the most part – it can be summed up as ‘I really appreciate her personality, but I don’t find her visuals very engaging’.

This Shangxiang however? Appears to be both the five traits I listed above and a total fucking badass. She looks like the leader of some back-in-the-day Sentai time! While there is inappropriate cleavage – not as bad as Yueying’s, but still – for the most part, Shangxiang is (bar some fetishistic breast and garter belt happenings, showcased in the ST3 card) reasonably dressed and has this incredible giant snake-eagle-other-badass-animals battle headdress. I just cannot stop looking at that headdress and I cannot get over how freaking awesome it is.

What’s also important is that, again, Shangxiang is energetic about going into battle. She loves physical activity and martial arts (if not the actual killing of people, which I doubt), and this Shangxiang is ready to get in there, show what she’s made of as well as do her job. This Shangxiang has been designed as energetic without necessarily being coded as childish. It’s almost as though a young woman has been depicted as competent and enthusiastic about battle, with little to any of this sexist baggage. The male gaze elements persist (as noted above), but overall, this design is so kickass that I can’t help but really adore it.

In terms of Non-Musou-3K figures being created, I adore the designs of both Guan Xing and Ma Dai.

Ma Dai, for those unaware, is famous for about three things – being the cousin of Ma Chao, escaping Cao Cao’s execution of Ma Teng by disguising himself, and killing Wei Yan. The last factor is generally the most notable; Ma Dai executed Wei Yan when Wei Yan was about to break orders and betray the army. However, there are ongoing debates as to whether Wei Yan was actually betraying them at all – it really is one of the most fluid scenarios in 3K history. In light of such, Ma Dai’s characterization tends to be determined by how Wei Yan is depicted (the reverse is less notable; in that Wei Yan is a higher-ranking general for a longer amount of time and a more dynamic character in the novel, thus he’s often introduced first). This specific Sangokushi Taisen design really feels like it could take advantage of both roles - he looks and carries himself in a manner that's rather ruthless and almost vindictive, but he also appears thoughtful enough to consider what the best decision for a situation is. He's also - despite his thoughtfulness - someone I feel is somewhat hasty; and overall he reminds me of Zhuge Liang without the ethical conviction.

Guan Xing is the son of Guan Yu; younger brother of Gaun Ping - Liu Bei forced him to (oh, Liu Bei) become sworn brothers with Zhang Fei's son Zhang Bao after their fathers were killed (at Fancheng and before Yi Ling, respectively) . The two were always pretty competitive with one another in a friendly manner, and it's been their main defining characteristic as such. Guan Xing also managed to kill the general who stole his father's blade, gaining it for himself. Also, he was greatly favoured by Zhuge Liang, who was pretty upset when he died. At any rate - besides that, Guan Xing was mostly an open slate, and that allowed an artist to create a lovely... tiger-based theme? I know, I was surprised too - does anyone know if there were any Tiger-based monikers for Guan Xing? Either way, Guan Xing's design is one that I feel is an excellent legacy to his father and uncle, in that he's clearly rugged and athletic but at the same time carries himself with a very, very strong sense of grace. Zhang Bao I'm not too fond of - since he... c'mon, he's Zhao Yun - but it is a nice compliment to Guan Xing's design. They're also visual character clones of Sun Ce & Zhou Yu.

See what I mean though? These designs are pretty fun and a great breath of fresh air for the most part (I won't mention Cao Ren). They can definitely inspire you to look at how the Sangoku characters can be interpreted difficulty, and lead to an interpretation that's wholly synthetic of iconography from vary sources.
link1 comment|Leave a comment!

Canadian Border Services - crossing borders Patriarchy doesn't care about. [Jun. 15th, 2009|10:45 am]
[Tags|]
[Audio |Yoko Kanno - Escape]

A woman from Montreal was forced to undress and spread her buttocks before Canadian Border Agents. They didn’t offer any explanation as to why she was forced to do this. They didn’t do anything to make this experience less fearful or less oppressive. All they did was get her into a room and force her to strip.

But what really blows me away is this.

Dominique McNeely, a spokesman for the Canada Border Services Agency, said he could not discuss the case, but said false matches occur and such checks are necessary.
"We can't let someone enter the country unless we're absolutely certain about their identity."


Necessary, are they? It’s totally necessary to induce and take advantage of the systematic fear and potential rape trigger by forcing her to undress and present herself in front of authority that we should be trusting? Oh yes – it’s completely necessary to sacrifice some woman so they can catch a ‘bad woman’. Women are completely interchangeable, of course.
There was really no other way to determine her identity other than forcing her to undress and spread her buttocks to see if there was a tattoo? There are no other distinguishing marks?

Apparently the deduction was made when they saw that she had the same last name and birthday as an alleged criminal. If they have that much information; then why the hell didn’t they check blood type or even just freaking ask her questions that only Ms. Menard would know? Or anything other than forcing her to undress and spread her ass so you can see if she had a tattoo?

Or – and goddess forbid – you give her the benefit of the doubt and ask her for any documentation she has. She was carrying her drivers license in combination with her health card and a passport.

Ménard says a police officer suggested she change her name to avoid future confusion.

Or you could just stop abusing your authority by suggesting such absurd things. It is her name, and it completely misses the point of acts of discrimination. Said suggestion is an act of victim blaming. It is no fault of hers that she happens to share a generic appearance, birth date and name with a recognized criminal. It is your fault, Canadian Border Services, for acting in such a dehumanizing, presumptuous and fear-inducing manner. It is your fault for not being aware or sensitive to the plight women face in attempting to own their own bodies – that they are demonized for maintaining bodily autonomy.

I’m well aware of the frustration and the difficulties that Canadian customs has. And I do appreciate their continued effort, but there is no excuse for this sort of behavior. No matter what new information comes up, the point is that a woman was forced to undress and spread her buttocks to authority. She was forced. Patriarchy has created the gall-filled excuse that this is her fault because she looks like a known criminal. Well, in Patriarchy’s mind – all women are criminals. That has to stop.
linkLeave a comment!

She's Indian! Then not. Identities are just that malleable. [Jun. 12th, 2009|01:39 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Audio |Aria Asia - Chiisana Koi no Uta]

There's been some rumbling since E3 about the PSP and it's future - how the PSPGo is primarily a waste (which makes me very giddy that I managed to get a cheap 1000 model; I seem to be a poser-retro gamer), and the advent that all PSP games will be available for download since the GO has no UMD drive. Either way, I was surprised by some of the future releases (other than Warriors Orochi 2, which I'd planned on purchasing beforehand) - Persona is one, Final Fantasy XIII Agito is another, but what I want to talk about is Tekken 6. Tekken 6 actually had the beautiful audacity to introduce a (what I understood at the time) Indian woman to a fighting game?

I was incredibly excited by the (now re-written) introduction of Zafina to Tekken 6;

The first character, Zafina is an Indian female who will have moves Harada likened to that of a "spider"and who enters the tournament to prevent the clash of the "two evil stars", believed to be Kazuya and Jin.

Subsequently I read more and became incredibly interested!

Zafina, who has great spiritual powers, was born to a group of spiritual warriors with an ancient past.

Since childhood, Zafina was raised to be a protector of an imperial tomb. Several years ago, a foreign army attacked the imperial tomb she and her group were protecting, and Zafina single handedly wiped every single one of them out. Since then, the group’s guru appointed her to be its sole assassin.

In her public life, she uses her spiritual powers as an astrologist, but recently she can only see evil omens, and her premonitions grow more and more intense day by day. Seeking to understand the meaning behind all of this, Zafina sought the advice of her guru, and he began to tell her an ancient tale passed down from generation to generation only to a select few. According to the tale, two evil stars will shake the world when they come into contact, and, inevitably, the two will unite with the sealed ancient evil being protected by her group, destroying the world. Zafina considered the meaning behind the guru’s tale and her premonitions well.

Setting out on a course that took her far east, to the place the evil stars were believed to be gathering, she journeyed with the intentions of destroying them.


Indian character? Woman? Defender of a tomb? Astrologer? Conviction? I was there. I'd always liked Tekken as a franchise, but ever since the death of Jun I'd struggled to find someone I like. And then they come out with this amazing woman, especially introducing her alongside the incredibly badass looking Leo? Well, Tekken had won me over (with my charitable nature concerning baby steps - because while the design is visually a treasure trove for the male gaze; the fact that an Indian woman was being shown with such conviction and agency was enough for me to forgive the problems somewhat).

Since then, things have gotten messy.

Zafina's ended up in ethnically ambiguous territory - she's associated with Egyptian imagery (one of her sets of alternate outfits is known as the 'Isis' set; the temple she is defending has two large statues of Ra), and Arabic iconography (her name is Arabic for 'Victorious', and director Katsuhiro Harada describes her as being Middle-Eastern). As well - and there hasn't been official confirmation of this - Zafina's fighting style was presumed to be based on Kalarippayattu, though it's officially listed as 'Ancient Assassination'. This assumption of Kalarippayattu most likely came about because initial interviews with Katsuhiro Harada were understood to confirm her as Indian (though if she were Indian, she would be from the northern or north-eastern area of India as her skin is that light, and Kalarippayattu is a primarily a Tamil & southern Indian martial art). Otherwise, her nationality is been officially stated as 'unknown'.

This isn't to say that identifying as Egyptian is mutually exclusive with identifying as 'Middle-Eastern' (seriously, there are countries in there - at least list the United Arab Emirates or something along those lines). But would it have been so difficult to actually give her a definitive nationality? It's almost heartbreaking - I've seen a number of reactions where people were genuinely excited to see an Indian woman in a fighting game. Press releases got in that game too. She would have been the first. Then it seems the translation was changed - Indian became Middle-Eastern. And then we saw more details of her intial context, and it introduced Ancient Egyptian iconography. It's frustrating that instead of definitively focusing on one ethnicity and cultural background, they created a character that's a mishmash of major areas of two freakin' continents. It really, really hurts any chance of Zafina being something of a strong paper mirror. I may not be a slinky assassin, but as an amateur astrologer and someone with Indian ancestry - it would have been nice to see.

And this isn't even to bring in arguably the worst part; in that her ethnic ambiguity has essentially led her into being coded in a male gazey Orientalism-based arabian princess type (with a pinch of sexy assassin). The fact that she's openly erotic in presentation is slightly diffused by the fact that the franchise has a strong number of female charactes (though the one who really saves it is Leo). And as much as I bloody adore Leo's design, I more or less flipped lovingly at Zafina's character because she as introduced as Indian, an astrologer, and a fighter - despite the problematic sexist design and carriage. Whether or not the introduction as an Indian character was a mistake or a miscommunication, people were genuinely excited - myself included. The destruction of not just her Indian ethnicity, but of any definitive ethnicity renders Zafina as less-than-progressive - she's become a racist, ambiguous mystical Othered character. There's a strong, definitive history of these mystical racially-othered characters and the fact that they took away a strong cultural identity really does hurt the character (and thusly, the franchise's depiction of women of colour as a whole). Instead of a character with roots that people could really understand and identify with, it's become a mismash of ethnic othering and sexist imagery.
linkLeave a comment!

Take 30 & the loss of progressive public discussion in mass media. [Jun. 11th, 2009|03:31 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Audio |Kenmochi Hidefumi - Avante]

This clip from the 1960s & 70s CBC television series, Take 30, is a phenomenal peice of discussion and a beautiful example of dialogue leading to growth and insight. It frankly speaks about systematic oppression in the Western world and the discussion is focused on defining the problem, what the goals are, and developing a strategy to ethically reach that goal. It features the incredibly astute and inspiring Kathleen Cleaver, as well as four other woman I'm not as familiar with - the late Jane Jacobs, Aboriginal Filmmaker Alanis Obomsawin, Wilfred Laurier profressor Margaret Norquay, and student leader Jennifer Penny (whom I'm unable to find information on).

One of the most beautiful facets of this discussion is that they aren't agreeing to disagree - instead, they're having a dialogue to deconstruct the perceptions they have one one another and thusly creating a solid foundation in which they can reliably define their goals, and the strategy to reach said goal. Penny and Prof. Norquay both acknowledge they're lack of understanding how one feels in Canadian Aboriginal oppression, and they express as such with a recognition that even though the problem isn't about them, something needs to be done. Cleaver respectfully and passionately deconstructs the perceptions the other women inadvertantly have (the best example is of The Right Hon. Clarkson's use of the phrase 'overthrowing the system'). Jacobs manages to obliterate the logical fallacy of 'white or black', by actively affirming the plight of ghettoized black Americans and the acknowledged manipulation of the white American majority. And Penny openly stated that individual action will not work when trying to increase living quality on a national and international scale. These are all peices of content that could be communicated in a way that was insulting or demeaning to the listening parties. It wasn't. They were treated as active contributors.

The Right Hon. Clarkson's questions and moderating of the discussion are direct and wonderfully clear - specifically, the questions she poses to Obamsawin, Jacobs and Cleaver. This discussion is by no means attempting to be impartial; the fact that they've created a panel discussing society and systematic oppression with 6 women is pretty clearly indicative of where the value system of the clip (and series) lies. The Right Hon. knows this, and thusly prepared and posed questions which would allow the women to expand on points of understanding that may be different from the other women - which would in turn prompt a dialogue about how to learn from each other (look at her smiling during Obamsawin's explanation of how she feels oppression and anger). She probably knew that this is the most likely outcome; given that these women are all actively dedicated to a feminist practice of learning from one another in an active, engaging manner. Furthermore, The Right Hon. doesn't directly participate in this discussion herself because a beneficial moderator steers the discussion rather than controlling it (if one tries to control it, then they shouldn't be moderating - they should be on their own platform, espousing what content they have).

One factor that does strike me is the whitification of The Right Hon. with her make-up. Compare her face in the clip with her here. While she's in a different age bracket, eyes don't shrink when one gets older. Although it's somewhat notable that sometimes it did show through to the credit of the CBC. Unfortunately, this was (and is) incredibly common in doing television make-up for women of East Asian & Pacific Islander ethnicity. It's the entire mindset of 'if you look too ethnic, the audience won't identify with you!', which I won't bother explaining in it's ridiculous offensiveness and ignorance.

One of my favourite parts of this discussion is how Cleaver communicates. Her content was beautiful, of course - but how she communicated it as such was so refreshing. It was honest, sincere, down-to-earth, and matter-of-factly. She was very, very open about the fact that people of privilege were welcome as long as they offer help that affirms the oppressed group's agency, and she was still very clear about the notion of privilege and how America's privileged classes don't respond to anything but violence. And even though there was a clear disconnect - her and Obomsawin's exchange about white conciouse - they still actively listend, affirmed and respected each other. And to be frank, I know there was a miscommunication there - it's clear from Cleaver's acceptance of accepting meaningful aid from privileged classes, that she was reffering to white people as a class, whereas I'd imagine Obomsawin was reffering to specific white individuals. And throughout her remarks, Cleaver carried herself with both conviction and open sensitivity, as well with a sense of forgiveness for potential offenses - her own, and others.

I love that Obomsawin went ahead and spoke with clarity and conviction about the frustration, rage, continued dissapointment and dignity that the Aboriginal peoples feel when dealing with predominately white institutions. Her entire change of mood could almost be classified as a narrative journey on our part; her opening up and change of mood and tone and sense of conviction - her emotional openness was an excellent, progressive change of pace for discussions that are often submerged in stoic rationality. It added so much to the discussion in terms of recognition of what is progressive action; in order to create a world of justice, we need to glorify both emotion and rational thought and nurture them together. They need harmony. And Obomsawin clearly is not in a state of harmony (having said as such) because of the cultural dissonance thurst upon her via white Canadian patriarchy.

I makes me incredibly sad to conciously recognize that we couldn't have such a debate openly in this era. This debate would be accused of pandering to the minorities, and that there isn't equal representation, and the entire false reality of post-racism/sexism/etc. would rear it's head, saying that we're excluding the voices of privilege. The ultimate voice of privilege. This entire scene would be slandered because it didn't recognize white male heterosexual able-bodied supremacy in a minority space that recognizes other voices first. The potential to have these discussions in popular mass media has been almost completley destroyed in the past decade or so. I just hope that we all manage to safeguard the ability to have these discussions at all.
linkLeave a comment!

Collected answers! [Jun. 9th, 2009|01:28 pm]
[Tags|, , ]
[Audio |Ikuko Kawai - Kanon]

Alright, so I do have quite a bit to write about - both politically and personally - but I can't seem to start or finish those entries right now, so what I'm going to do is call an...

ARCHIVE DAY!

These are a series of answers from questions and discussion that arose from CHAnges in discussing GLAAD Call-To-Action (and please read it, I emplore you - as citizens and as you were once children yourselves). The answers I've written I may re-write at some point, so I feel it makes sense to store them here.

Also! I'm still looking for any ideas or suggestions for my In-Progress Comment Policy & FAQ.

Discussing the logical fallacy of 'Women being able to wear whatever they wish' without consequence. )

On 'Which group whom identify within LGBTQI2S state has the most reported acts of violence perpetrated against them?' )

On acknowledging LGBTQI2S aesthetic standards as different from heteronormative standards. )
linkLeave a comment!

Hey you! I comment on your body and it better matter! [Jun. 4th, 2009|04:03 pm]
[Tags|, ]
[Audio |Yoshi Blessed - Amazin Love Ft Yukari Gospel]

I am so angry right now. So fucking angry.

This morning I read three fat-phobic evidence anecdotes.

It doesn't matter that this shit happens all the time. It doesn't matter that this shit could be comparable in terms of 'who got it worse' and 'who got it better'. It doesn't matter that it's unintentional or not.

What matters is that it happened and it shouldn't have.

This shit happening on a consistent basis does not placate me. It does not make weep or cry in despair (to the point of crushing me). It does not make me go 'Oh, shock and awe - more bigotry.' in a dispassionate, removed manner.

This shit makes me angry. It makes me contemptuous. I think people who know me or have met me physically know that when I get angry, it's still expressed in a relatively calm manner. But that does not mean I'm not angry; it does not mean I'm not upset; it does not mean I'm not perturbed. It just means that I am expressing myself in a calm manner. And what I am expressing is anger at social injustice.

This is the kind of shit that re-enforces my effort that I made the right desicion by not 'playing the game'. Because it's cruel, it's inhumane, it's dehumanizing, it's judgemental, it's freaking ignorant and it's a violation of bodily autonomy. To reference elle of elle, phd;

"Yes, a rape culture.

How else would you describe a culture in which the logical consequence of acting a certain way or wearing a certain thing is understood to be the violation of one’s bodily autonomy?"

That's exactly what these acts are - a violation of bodily autonomy. No, the narratives referenced above are not the physical act of rape, but the oppressive parties invade one's bodily autonomy by acting on the belief that they have a right to judge other people's bodies. Other people's health. These things, again, are none of anyone else's business. But apparently people are open game for taunts and judgement and verbal terrorism by the simple act of existing. They don't even have to be visible, and jokes on their body are free game. Judgements on someone else's body? Free game. And this shit isn't even satirical mockery, this is flat out fat-hatred and mysoginy.

If anyone ever needed a call to action to begin participating in fat acceptance and body activism, wouldn't looking at those three stories and recognizing that they are so common qualify? How on earth can anyone justify this mindless skeevy hurt? They can't. They can rationalize, they can give excuses, and they can explain away their behaviour but there is no justification for it. It's at this point that one, when they have fucked up, learn how to fuck up well. Learn how to make amends, learn how to respect people, learn how to not be in an invasive ponce.

Just fucking learn how.
linkLeave a comment!

I need your help! FAQ and the like. [Jun. 4th, 2009|01:20 pm]
[Tags|]
[Audio |Yoshi Blessed - Ordinary Ft Elijah and Ken]

So, for those of you around and the like - I've been attempting to complete a personal Bio, comments policy and FAQ. This is obviously a precaution - it isn't as though this place is crawling with trolls or the like - but I want to get it into place in case events happen or something. At any rate, here is what I have so far.

About Me, Comment Policy & FAQ )

I am pretty much out of ideas at this point, and I'd really like feedback on what to add. Please don't be shy with your suggestions! There's no 'stupid suggestions' or the like. I want to hear what you have to say, please. I really appreciate it.
linkLeave a comment!

The epitome of good taste? [Jun. 3rd, 2009|10:55 am]
[Tags|]
[Audio |Onmyouza - Kouga Ninpochou]

On the wake of my previous entry - Are you bloody kidding me?
Seriously, what? What?

Oh, PETA. You asshat of douchery.

The ethical treatment of animals in Western society is a serious issue. PETA, as an organization, is clearly not about as such because they've demonstrated consistently and wantonly a lack of ethical character. On a number of times I've been potentially swayed to joining PETA or becoming involved in their activities, because the level of waste and total lack of respect (alongside mass cruelty and torture) directed towards animals is horrifying.

But then they do crap as linked above, and any consideration is shot in the foot because the organization is so predicated on taking advantage of the plights of other oppressed social groups. It's a really, really disturbing trend that's quite easy to understand - increase in greed and climates of fear means that NGOs and non-profits get less money because they don't re-enforce a dangerous capitalist culture (in an oversimplified nutshell). Logically, PETA is about profit at this point. However, this is an explanation - not an excuse. PETA has no excuse for what they've done. And PETA - you aren't even owning up to it. What else is there for me to say to you?
linkLeave a comment!

Anti-choicers. Be freaking honest about what you are. [Jun. 2nd, 2009|02:58 pm]
[Tags|]
[Audio |Indigo Jam Unit - Nostalgia]

Dr. George Tiller was assassinated.

I'd actually never heard of Dr. Tiller before his death. I'm ashamed to say as such, but more so I'm horrified and angry that the institutions that condoned this sort of domestic terrorism beforehand are now backing away from being associated with the killer. The work that he'd done for women in America and globally is heroic and inspiring.

To which I say - Why? Why back away, anti-choice institutions and individuals? This is your victory! Embrace it! You had continuously called for the death of this man; for him to be brought to your own brand of warped, disgusting justice. You terrorized him and his family. You created an environment where these ideas and actions were nurtured, where they were encouraged to mentally torture this man. What did you contribute to his life?

Nothing beneficial. Because you are not pro-life.

If you were pro-life, you would consider the mental health of the birth mothers and the anguish many women go through after going through the adoption process with little to no support, instead of assuming that the wombs that nurture fetuses and babies aren't connected to anyone.

If you were pro-life, you would work on increasing the quality of life for unadopted orphans.

If you were pro-life, you would not be celebrating assassination.

That's the crux of it, anti-choicers. You aren't pro-life. You're anti-choice. You don't think that women have the mental capacity to choose whether or not they will go through the experience of carrying a potential human being in their wombs. A potential human being. Potential. Person.

You're calling abortion doctors and the women who willing have abortions murderers. Pre-emptive murderers. Zygotes don't have a consciousness. It's akin to saying that trimming my nails is murder, or cutting my hair is genocide. It makes light of the actual mental development human beings go through in order to become the person we are today.

Anti-choicers? Instead of encouraging the development of human beings, you are terrorizing the human beings who exist. Logically, does this make sense? The cognitive dissonance that you're providing to people whom listen to what you say while witnessing your actions is enormous.

Again - if you were pro-life, you would be following through with increasing the quality of life for all human beings. Instead, you're crushing it almost universally while attempting to bring more human beings into a planet that does not have the resources to care for them.

I do not trust you, anti-choice movement. I do not trust you because you are not even honest about what you are.
link2 comments|Leave a comment!

Fictional solidarity and the badassery of Adrienne Clarkson & Gov. Gen. Michelle Jean. [Jun. 2nd, 2009|12:22 pm]
[Tags|, , , ]
[Audio |Indigo Jam Unit - REN]

As much as this is a complex issue that deserves quite a deal of critique, I can't help but be totally impressed by Governor General Michaelle Jean's badassery in the face of demonization, accusation and blatant attacks on her character in an event that's been grossly oversimplified and colluded with incredibly sexist comparisons.

The woman stands her ground, states what she did with conviction and pride, and manages to come out as a figure of awe in this scenario. However, what I want to talk about is not the heart eating in and of itself. What I want to talk about is the incredibly sexist, racist and just ignorant assumption that Adrienne Clarkson has some vendetta against Michaelle Jean, when in reality it's far more likely that she just doesn't care because it's none of her business.

One of my favourite (and by favourite, I mean absolutely abhorred) creations of media fiascos is the nurtured perception of some crapshoot catfight rivalry. As we all know, the Patriarchy and patriarchal media love a good cat fight. And if they can't find one, they'll misrepresent or make it up and use it as entertainment for the patriarchal gaze. And this article so lovingly states, Adrienne Clarkson - by voicing neither condemnation or approval - is throwing Jean to the sharks, via her lack of acknowledgment of the act. This is utter bull, I find - there isn't even a consideration of the idea that Adrienne didn't offer an opinion because this has nothing to do with her. Yes, she was and is an active part of establishing solidarity with people of indigenous roots - and this work is incredibly important in establishing a culture of inclusiveness and personhood - but this does not mean that there is any obligation or duty to judge, comment on or even be aware of the Governor General's activities. If she has a comment, then it's because of her own concerns about how this may affect the relationship between Canada's persons of indigenous heritage and the Canadian federal government or the like. It's not because she has a responsibility to Governor General Michaelle Jean. I know this. I have a pretty good hunch that both Adrienne Clarkson and Michaelle Jean know this. Media channels seem to be the only ones who missed this memo.

One of the fallacies of (white, straight, people with privilege, etc.) people's perception of minority groups is that there's clear, tacit solidarity with everyone who's a part of said group. This isn't so, and it completely destroys the the notion of internalized isms and levels of social hierarchy. White liberal media loves the idea that all minority groups are monolithically loving to one another and to other minority groups, while fanatical Patriarchy loves it when people of minority status fight amongst one another for affirmation from it. Neither assumption has any logical basis in reality.

There is nothing that says that these two women have to be best friends. They don't even have to be close. They're women whom have occupied the same position, and they can respect each others careers. And that's it. They don't have to do anymore or any less. Just because they're both women of colour does not mean that there is instant or inherent solidarity between them. They're people, with tastes and perceptions and likes and dislikes all of their own. They're allowed to make their own friends, social circles, and community. And there isn't anything that says they have to be involved in each others social community. As well, there's nothing that says these women are absolute archenemies; vying to see who can take down who in a manner of total humiliation. Simply because they had similar careers or have similar status in patriarchal social hierarchy doesn't mean that they're clawing at each other for scraps of fame or affirmation. These women have little to nothing to do with one another, and as human beings that often happens. They are just two women whom happen to have the same career, similar spoken goals and comparable patriarchal social standing. Those factors to not lead to instantaneous bonding. It's an insult to the nurtured and developed solidarity within feminist communities and anti-oppressive movements to assume that such bonding is so easy. It's never as easy as recognizing shared plights.

It's incredibly offensive on both ends to assume that Adrienne Clarkson somehow is required to comment or have a comment on Governor General Jean's actions. Again, if Adrienne Clarkson went ahead and actually had a comment on the Governor Generals actions, I would presume it would be out of a sense of bond towards the North of Canada and because of solidarity with the Inuit people as opposed to some presumed-by-others connection that she had towards the Governor General because of shared status. It presumes meaningful bonds and solidarity are formed solely from an identification of shared status, and completely destroys the work nurturing positive emotional perceptions and connections between one another. If Governor General Michaelle Jean and Adrienne Clarkson form such a bond, then all the more beneficial for them - those bonds only enhance our quality of life, provided we have continued commitment to them.

But making out a relationship (positive or negative) between two individuals when there isn't one just makes you look like you have a thick head, media channels. And you guys really don't need that.

And in case you haven't noted - I freakin' admire and adore both of these women. Oh, heroes of mine these two are.
linkLeave a comment!

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]